2020
DOI: 10.1111/obes.12372
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mixed Causal–Noncausal Autoregressions: Bimodality Issues in Estimation and Unit Root Testing1

Abstract: This paper stresses the bimodality of the likelihood function of the Mixed causal-noncausal AutoRegressions (MAR), and it is shown that the bimodality issue becomes more salient as the causal root approaches unity from below. The consequences are important as the roots of the local maxima are typically interchanged, attributing the noncausal component to the causal one and vice-versa. This severely changes the interpretation of the results, and the properties of unit root tests of the backward root are adverse… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This can be seen in the magnitude of the lag and lead coefficients. The bimodality of the coefficient distribution in the estimation can lead, in the optimization of the likelihood function, to a local maximum (Bec, Bohn Nielsen, and Saïdi, 2019). This phenomenon is subject to initial values and can induce a switch between the lag and lead coefficients.…”
Section: Estimation Results: Models Identificationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This can be seen in the magnitude of the lag and lead coefficients. The bimodality of the coefficient distribution in the estimation can lead, in the optimization of the likelihood function, to a local maximum (Bec, Bohn Nielsen, and Saïdi, 2019). This phenomenon is subject to initial values and can induce a switch between the lag and lead coefficients.…”
Section: Estimation Results: Models Identificationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(and not only weak white noise) non-Gaussian to ensure the identifiability of the causal and the noncausal part (Breidt et al, 1991). There is a increasing literature making use of MAR models; see among others Karapanagiotidis (2014), Hencic and Gouriéroux (2015), Gouriéroux and Jasiak (2016), Lof and Nyberg (2017), Hecq and Sun (2021), Bec et al (2020), Gourieroux et al (2021b), Gourieroux et al (2021a).…”
Section: Notationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This section recalls the causal-noncausal convolution model and provides the joint characteristic function that 1 The bimodality in the distribution of monthly WTI crude oil prices evidenced in this paper has been often disregarded in the existing literature (see, e.g., Bec et al, 2020).…”
Section: Convolution Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many financial time series display local explosions occurring as spikes and bubbles, which are short-lasting local trends followed by a sudden or gradual burst. These patterns characterize the series of commodity prices (Bec, Nielsen, & Saidi, 2020;Voisin & Hecq, 2020), cryptocurrency exchange rates (see, e.g., Cavaliere, Nielsen, & Rahbek, 2018;Gourieroux & Hencic, 2015;Hou, Wang, Chen, & Härdle, 2020) and other financial and macro-economic time series (see, e.g., Fries & Zakoian, 2019;Gourieroux, Hencic, & Jasiak, 2020;Hecq, Issler, & Telg, 2020;Hecq & Sun, 2020). Over the past 10 years, univariate locally explosive time series have been commonly modelled and estimated from the causal-noncausal mixed autoregressive (MAR) models (Lanne & Saikkonen, 2011).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%