2017
DOI: 10.1002/2016ja023694
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

MMS observation of inverse energy dispersion in shock drift accelerated ions

Abstract: The four Magnetospheric Multiscale (MMS) spacecraft observed a ∼1 min burst of energetic ions (50–1000 keV) in the region upstream from the subsolar quasi‐perpendicular bow shock on 6 December 2015. The composition, flux levels, and spectral indices of these energetic protons, helium, and oxygen ions greatly resemble those seen in the outer magnetosphere earlier while MMS crossed the magnetopause and differ significantly from those simultaneously observed far upstream by Advanced Composition Explorer (ACE). Ho… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 69 publications
(69 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In an attempt to highlight the novelty of the statistical study presented here amidst the extremely rich history of the study of energetic electrons beyond the magnetopause, a substantial (but admittedly nonexhaustive) literature review is provided in section 1.1. It must be emphasized that this paper (and the review included) will focus specifically on observations of energetic (greater than tens of keV) electrons observed in the magnetosheath and upstream of the bow shock and is independent of the extremely rich literature regarding the well‐documented history of lower energy (eV to several keV) particles at/beyond the magnetopause [e.g., Freeman et al , ; Montgomery et al , ; Scarf et al , ; Hones et al , ; Scudder et al , ; Reasoner , ; Eastman et al , ; Cowley , ; Fuselier et al , , ; Lefebvre et al , ; Lee et al , , and references therein] and observations of escaping magnetospheric ions [e.g., West and Buck , ; Anagnostopoulos et al , ; Sibeck et al , , ; Zong et al , ; Eccles and Fritz , ; Kronberg et al , ; Westlake et al , , and references therein], upstream ion events [e.g., Asbridge et al , ; Lin et al , ; Scholer et al , , ; Desai et al , , and references therein], and shock‐related ion acceleration [e.g., Ipavich et al , ; Gosling , ; Armstrong et al , ; Forman and Webb , ; Scholer , ; Thomsen , ; Sibeck et al , ; Burgess et al , ; Lee et al , , and references therein]. We focus here on electrons because ions have a broader array of escape mechanisms [ Mauk et al , ] that make their study substantially more complex.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In an attempt to highlight the novelty of the statistical study presented here amidst the extremely rich history of the study of energetic electrons beyond the magnetopause, a substantial (but admittedly nonexhaustive) literature review is provided in section 1.1. It must be emphasized that this paper (and the review included) will focus specifically on observations of energetic (greater than tens of keV) electrons observed in the magnetosheath and upstream of the bow shock and is independent of the extremely rich literature regarding the well‐documented history of lower energy (eV to several keV) particles at/beyond the magnetopause [e.g., Freeman et al , ; Montgomery et al , ; Scarf et al , ; Hones et al , ; Scudder et al , ; Reasoner , ; Eastman et al , ; Cowley , ; Fuselier et al , , ; Lefebvre et al , ; Lee et al , , and references therein] and observations of escaping magnetospheric ions [e.g., West and Buck , ; Anagnostopoulos et al , ; Sibeck et al , , ; Zong et al , ; Eccles and Fritz , ; Kronberg et al , ; Westlake et al , , and references therein], upstream ion events [e.g., Asbridge et al , ; Lin et al , ; Scholer et al , , ; Desai et al , , and references therein], and shock‐related ion acceleration [e.g., Ipavich et al , ; Gosling , ; Armstrong et al , ; Forman and Webb , ; Scholer , ; Thomsen , ; Sibeck et al , ; Burgess et al , ; Lee et al , , and references therein]. We focus here on electrons because ions have a broader array of escape mechanisms [ Mauk et al , ] that make their study substantially more complex.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%