2016 IEEE Symposium on Service-Oriented System Engineering (SOSE) 2016
DOI: 10.1109/sose.2016.25
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mobile Application Software Defect Prediction

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In studies that do not employ deep learning techniques, for the most part, a static feature selection that is manually chosen by knowledgeable domain experts is preferred. However, we also observed that the Correlation-based Feature Selection (CFS) method was used in several studies [ 37 , 38 , 39 , 40 , 41 ] as the feature subset selection technique. Secondly, gain ratio attribute evaluation is used [ 42 , 43 , 44 ] to reduce the high-dimensionality and further improve efficiency.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In studies that do not employ deep learning techniques, for the most part, a static feature selection that is manually chosen by knowledgeable domain experts is preferred. However, we also observed that the Correlation-based Feature Selection (CFS) method was used in several studies [ 37 , 38 , 39 , 40 , 41 ] as the feature subset selection technique. Secondly, gain ratio attribute evaluation is used [ 42 , 43 , 44 ] to reduce the high-dimensionality and further improve efficiency.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They conducted experiments on an open source app with seven machine learning methods and the results showed that process metrics-based models achieved better performance for defect prediction on apps. Ricky et al [45] proposed an SVM method to predict defects on apps. Their experimental results on five datasets showed that their SVM method achieved better performance than that of the decision trees.…”
Section: Defect Prediction For Android Appsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ricky et al. [45] proposed an SVM method to predict defects on apps. Their experimental results on five datasets showed that their SVM method achieved better performance than that of the decision trees.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Software defect prediction technology is to design software metrics related to software defects by analyzing software code, software development process, etc., and then establish the relationship between software metrics and software defects by using historical defect data. Many technologies based on machine learning have been used to predict software defects, including artificial neural network [7], bayesian network [8], SVM [9], dictionary learning [10], association rule [11], naive bayes [12], tree-based methods [13], evolutionary algorithm [14], etc. However, these algorithms ignore the high dimension and class distribution imbalance of the defect data set, which have a great impact on classification performance [15].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%