1998
DOI: 10.1007/s002540050346
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mobilization and attenuation of heavy metals within a nickel mine tailings impoundment near Sudbury, Ontario, Canada

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
31
0
2

Year Published

2008
2008
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 63 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
31
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…It should be noted here that with 50% of the tailings particles finer than 0.12 mm diameter (D 50 of 0.12 mm), the selected tailings material may appear quite coarse; however, this is not unusual for copper tailings (Vick 1990). Such coarse tailings are also representative of the material stored at the Sudbury tailings management facility as shown by Shaw et al (1998) and McGregor et al (1998). Additionally, in their study on tailings resuspension, Adu-Wusu et al (2001) used uranium tailings from the Quirke tailings pond at Elliot Lake, Northern Ontario, for which they reported a D 50 between 0.10 and 0.17 mm at 7 out of the 9 tailings sampling stations.…”
Section: Tailings Beds Preparationmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…It should be noted here that with 50% of the tailings particles finer than 0.12 mm diameter (D 50 of 0.12 mm), the selected tailings material may appear quite coarse; however, this is not unusual for copper tailings (Vick 1990). Such coarse tailings are also representative of the material stored at the Sudbury tailings management facility as shown by Shaw et al (1998) and McGregor et al (1998). Additionally, in their study on tailings resuspension, Adu-Wusu et al (2001) used uranium tailings from the Quirke tailings pond at Elliot Lake, Northern Ontario, for which they reported a D 50 between 0.10 and 0.17 mm at 7 out of the 9 tailings sampling stations.…”
Section: Tailings Beds Preparationmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…depths of 1-1.5 m; (Moncur et al, 2002;Gieré, Sidenko and Lazareva, 2003)) of large tailings deposits. Tailings particles in the hardpans are often cemented with gypsum, goethite, and other minerals that are insoluble or only partially soluble in water (McGregor and Blowes, 2002;McGregor et al, 1998b). Hardpans may also be important in directing the flow of water and controlling the oxidation and leaching of arsenic and other contaminants in the tailings.…”
Section: Behavior Of Arsenic Within Mining Wastesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, distilled water extracts from these 404 tailings indicated that the extractions were saturated to 405 supersaturated with calcite, dolomite, gypsum, jarosite, and 406 iron oxyhydroxides (Navarro et al 2004). Pore water sat-407 uration, with respect to jarosite, natrojarosite, and gypsum 408 McGregor et al 1998), and the possible 409 mobilization of metals from oxyhydroxides and sulfates, 410 have been detected in other tailings areas. Ribet et al 411 (1995) and Jurjovec et al (2002) respectively showed that 412 tailings Fe(III) oxyhydroxides were the source of Fe, Ni, 413 Cu, Cr, and Co, and Zn, Ni, Co, Pb, and Cd.…”
Section: U N C O R R E C T E D P R O O Fmentioning
confidence: 99%