2020
DOI: 10.1109/lra.2020.2972836
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Model-Based Generalization Under Parameter Uncertainty Using Path Integral Control

Abstract: Fig. 1. Environments where we test our method on model-based control for generalizing under parameter uncertainty. Top row illustrates the experimental test beds where we test object reconfiguration, opening drawers, and nonprehensile manipulation under parameter uncertainty. Bottom row illustrates a sample set of the simulated environments where we tested our method. From left to right we have the Shadow hand manipulating a dice, a half-cheetah robot performing a backflip, and the Adroit hand opening a door.A… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
25
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…When benchmarking the controller, the researchers selected a 6-DOF robot arm and set up a series of tasks. To solve the problem of parameter uncertainty ( Abraham et al, 2020 ), the researchers proposed a model-predictive path integral control strategy.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When benchmarking the controller, the researchers selected a 6-DOF robot arm and set up a series of tasks. To solve the problem of parameter uncertainty ( Abraham et al, 2020 ), the researchers proposed a model-predictive path integral control strategy.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After one Parareal iteration, x 1 1 is exactly the fine solution. After two iterations, x 1 1 and x 2 2 are exactly the fine solutions. When k = N , Parareal produces the exact fine solution [11,25].…”
Section: Pararealmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The robot must complete the task without pushing other objects off the table or into the goal region to contact-based/non-prehensile manipulation planning and control-especially during re-planning or model-predictive control (MPC) where a robot executes an action in the realworld, gets the resulting state and then has to generate a new physics-based plan. Such MPC methods have been used in prior work to achieve manipulation robustness to parameter uncertainty [1], stabilize complex humanoid behaviours [35], and visually manipulate fabric [19].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ref. [8] utilized model ensemble to tackle this problem, however, the ensemble of models normally deteriorate computation speed and may be inefficiency for real-time system. In [9], a ℒ adaptive control method is combined with MPPI to address this problem and validated in multirotor racing.…”
Section: Model-based Rlmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, MPPI sometimes suffer from degradation of robustness when the deep neural dynamics differs with the real environment. Many work try to robustified the MPPI method by ensemble models [8], ℒ adaptive control [9], and so on. Tube-MPPI method is also proposed by combining an ancillary controller to keep the system states in the tube centered at nominal state computed using MPPI as nominal controller [10].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%