2019
DOI: 10.1017/prm.2019.45
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Model category structures and spectral sequences

Abstract: Let R be a commutative ring with unit. We endow the categories of filtered complexes and of bicomplexes of R-modules, with cofibrantly generated model structures, where the class of weak equivalences is given by those morphisms inducing a quasiisomorphism at a certain fixed stage of the associated spectral sequence. For filtered complexes, we relate the different model structures obtained, when we vary the stage of the spectral sequence, using the functors shift and décalage.

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
16
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
1
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We write n-mC R for the category of n-multicomplexes. The case n = 2 gives the category of bicomplexes and the results here recover those of [2]. Multicomplexes can be thought of as the case n = ∞ and we make frequent use of this notational device.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 61%
“…We write n-mC R for the category of n-multicomplexes. The case n = 2 gives the category of bicomplexes and the results here recover those of [2]. Multicomplexes can be thought of as the case n = ∞ and we make frequent use of this notational device.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 61%
“…This motivates the following refined version of quasi-isomorphism (cf. [15,29] for different but related notions). Definition 10.…”
Section: And Equality Holds If and Only Ifmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With this background at hand, let us survey the main applications: Firstly, the following refined notion of quasi-isomorphism is particularly well behaved (see also [15,29] for studies of different notions of quasi-isomorphism from a rational homotopy-theoretic point of view).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Remark 2.9. In the language of witnesses adopted in [CELW18b], the difference between the Z r (D)-cycles and the Z r -cycles is essentially the difference between specifying witnesses and just requiring the existence of them. More precisely, Z p, * r (D)/F p−r (D) corresponds to the witness r-cycles for split filtered complexes.…”
Section: The Spectral Sequence Associated To a Multicomplexmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This corresponds to the bicomplex ZW r of [CELW18b], a representing object for the witness r-cycles.…”
Section: Examplesmentioning
confidence: 99%