DOI: 10.3990/1.9789085702986
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Model checking Markov Chains: Techniques and Tools

Abstract: Probabilistic model checking has been a successful research field in the recent decades. This dissertation deals with four important aspects of model checking Markov chains: the development of efficient model-checking tools, the improvement of model-checking algorithms, the efficiency of the state-space reduction techniques, and the development of simulation-based model-checking procedures.We start by introducing MRMC, a model checker for discrete-time and continuoustime Markov reward models. It supports rewar… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 138 publications
(182 reference statements)
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Sampling is said to be unbiased if the expectation of the sample distribution is the same as the expectation of the true distribution. The use of unbiased sampling distinguishes our methods from most recent efforts to devise sampling-based algorithms for time-unbounded properties, which are based on biased sampling [21,18,27,3] (see Sect. 4).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Sampling is said to be unbiased if the expectation of the sample distribution is the same as the expectation of the true distribution. The use of unbiased sampling distinguishes our methods from most recent efforts to devise sampling-based algorithms for time-unbounded properties, which are based on biased sampling [21,18,27,3] (see Sect. 4).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This approach has been used in the past for program analysis [20], and more recently for model checking [27] using biased sampling. The algorithm is ensured termination for any finite-state homogeneous discrete-time Markov chain, although it is potentially applicable for any model for which we can perform reachability.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For several very large finite models, INFAMY is competitive with PRISM, as evident from Section 3. Model checkers based on discrete-event simulation [10,11,12,9] Using truncation, we compute a finite submodel which is sufficient for checking the validity of a property given in time-dependent CSL. This is done by descending into the CSL formula and at the same time exploring the model subject to the different time bounds given in the subformulas as well as the rates occurring in the model (details can be found in [13]).…”
Section: Introducing Infamymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…MRMC implements an efficient algorithm to compute maximal time-bounded reachability probabilities in uniform CTMDPs [4]. Finally, (3) MRMC includes a discrete-event simulation engine for simulative CSL model checking [55]. MRMC is thus the first tool with simulation-based model checking of full CSL.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%