1998
DOI: 10.1121/1.421114
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Model experiment to study sonic boom propagation through turbulence. Part I: General results

Abstract: A model experiment to study the effect of atmospheric turbulence on sonic booms is reported. The model sonic booms are N waves produced by electric sparks, and the model turbulence is created by a plane jet. Of particular interest are the changes in waveform, peak pressure, and rise time of the model N waves after they have passed through the model turbulence. A review is first given of previous experiments on the effect of turbulence on both sonic booms and model N waves. This experiment was designed so that … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
42
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 63 publications
(43 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
1
42
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Let us recall that the only objective here is to investigate in the laboratory the detailed physical effects associated with the interaction of a shock wave with a heterogeneity, and to profit from the opportunity offered by the deterministic aspect of the experiment. In particular, this deterministic aspect will now allow us to make a detailed comparison with a numerical model, including a waveform to waveform comparison at the same point in the same propagation conditions, something that is impossible to perform in a statistical propagation case, either during flight tests or even in a laboratory turbulence experiment ͑such as Lipkens and Blackstock, 1998 or Blanc-Benon et al 2002͒.…”
Section: Consequences On the Variability Of The Waveformmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Let us recall that the only objective here is to investigate in the laboratory the detailed physical effects associated with the interaction of a shock wave with a heterogeneity, and to profit from the opportunity offered by the deterministic aspect of the experiment. In particular, this deterministic aspect will now allow us to make a detailed comparison with a numerical model, including a waveform to waveform comparison at the same point in the same propagation conditions, something that is impossible to perform in a statistical propagation case, either during flight tests or even in a laboratory turbulence experiment ͑such as Lipkens and Blackstock, 1998 or Blanc-Benon et al 2002͒.…”
Section: Consequences On the Variability Of The Waveformmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The resulting 100 different sonic boom signatures were assessed with regard to the nondeterministic effects of atmospheric turbulence on sonic boom [15]. In addition, the turbulent field was assumed to be frozen (i.e., the turbulent velocity is constant during sonic boom propagation).…”
Section: Numerical Models and Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the laboratory-scale experiments which simulate the N-shaped waveform, a front and tail shock waves have the same waveform deformed by turbulent effects [10,30]. It seems that the front and tail shock waves receive the same shock focusing/diffracting effects.…”
Section: Turbulence Interaction With Long Rise-time Signaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, the strong atmospheric turbulence leads to a high probability of these deformed waveforms; the deformation depends on the turbulence intensity. According to a laboratory-scale experiment, in the case of a shockturbulence interaction, the mean overpressure decreases, the mean rise time increases, and the standard deviations increase [10]. The larger standard deviations suggest that the large overpressure and short rise time may occur.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation