2014
DOI: 10.7566/jpsj.83.124706
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Model Selection of NiGa2S4 Triangular Lattice by Bayesian Inference

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For comparison, also the values of J n [meV] estimated in previous studies are listed. LDA+U: LDA+U calculation, 9) UHF: unrestricted Hartree-Fock calculation, 11) UHF+B: Bayesian inference from the UHF results, 12) DDCI2: ab-initio cluster calculation, 13) NS: neutron scattering, 3) ESR: electron spin resonance. 8) ninth nearest-neighbors, which are all smaller than at most 1.2 meV.…”
Section: Mapping Onto Classical Heisenberg Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For comparison, also the values of J n [meV] estimated in previous studies are listed. LDA+U: LDA+U calculation, 9) UHF: unrestricted Hartree-Fock calculation, 11) UHF+B: Bayesian inference from the UHF results, 12) DDCI2: ab-initio cluster calculation, 13) NS: neutron scattering, 3) ESR: electron spin resonance. 8) ninth nearest-neighbors, which are all smaller than at most 1.2 meV.…”
Section: Mapping Onto Classical Heisenberg Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the theoretical side, spin exchanges were estimated by a first-principles electronic structure calculation (LDA+U) 9) and unrestricted Hartree-Fock (UHF) calculations combined with x-ray photo-emission spectroscopy (XPS) 10,11) or with Bayesian inference. 12) These are based on the itinerant electron picture. They concluded that the third nearest-neighbor coupling is large, which naturally leads to the magnetic ordering with Q ∼ (1/6, 1/6).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is a challenging inverse problem in quantum mechanics, for which previous machine-learning solutions were devised but for 1D problems only, such as those based on multilayered neural networks [31] or the nonparametric Bayesian approximation [32]. Bayesian estimation, in particular, has been applied to other problems in solid state physics [33,34], but this is a method that has some limitations depending on the level of complexity of the problem at hand. For instance, it is typically difficult to cover the whole hypothesis space or guess appropriate priors.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, datadriven techniques are becoming indispensable in materials science, because they should accelerate the discovery of novel materials [16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28] and deepen our understanding of materials [29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36] . From the viewpoint of effective model estimations, data-driven techniques are also efficient to accelerate automatic searches for appropriate model parameters 37 and to extract relevant model parameters [38][39][40] .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%