2017
DOI: 10.1017/s0022109017000011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Model Uncertainty and Exchange Rate Forecasting

Abstract: Exchange rate models with uncertain and incomplete information predict that investors focus on a small set of fundamentals that changes frequently over time. We design a model selection rule that captures the current set of fundamentals that best predicts the exchange rate. Out-of-sample tests show that the forecasts made by this rule significantly beat a random walk for 5 out of 10 currencies. Furthermore, the currency forecasts generate meaningful investment profits. We demonstrate that the strong performanc… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
13
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
2
13
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Along these lines, this kind of disagreement in forecasting measures is not uncommon and has also been documented for exchange rates (see, e.g., Abbate & Marcellino, ; Fratzscher, Rime, Sarno, & Zinna, ). An exception in this respect is Kouwenberg et al (), who report successful results also in terms of point forecasting accuracy, though at a quarterly data frequency over a different evaluation period and exchange rates/fundamentals different from ours. We report results for our sample based on their approach in the Supporting Information Appendix.…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 66%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Along these lines, this kind of disagreement in forecasting measures is not uncommon and has also been documented for exchange rates (see, e.g., Abbate & Marcellino, ; Fratzscher, Rime, Sarno, & Zinna, ). An exception in this respect is Kouwenberg et al (), who report successful results also in terms of point forecasting accuracy, though at a quarterly data frequency over a different evaluation period and exchange rates/fundamentals different from ours. We report results for our sample based on their approach in the Supporting Information Appendix.…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 66%
“…Other techniques have been successfully used, including elastic net shrinkage (Li, Tsiakas, & Wang, ), gradient boosting (Berge, ), and model averaging/selection (Della Corte, Sarno, & Tsiakas, ; Della Corte & Tsiakas, ; Kouwenberg, Markiewicz, Verhoeks, & Zwinkels, ). All these approaches find sparsity to be an important modeling feature and, in particular, Kouwenberg et al () illustrate also the time‐varying relevance of regressors in a univariate framework. Our work corroborates these findings in a multivariate approach that allows us to assess the incremental value of fundamentals in addition to VAR lags and vice versa.…”
Section: Relation To the Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It is worth noting the use of simulation, though on the basis of the training method of support vectors (Yuan, 2013) as well as to improve the quality of the forecast using random processes (Moosa, 2013). Attention is drawn to the account of uncertainty in the forecasting of exchange rates (Kouwenberg, Markiewicz, Verhoeks, 2017;Detken C. 2002). It is proposed to use cointegration methods and random processes models (Moosa, Vaz, 2016) including those that take into account incomplete information (Juselius, 2017).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other topics of study include: the impact of exchange rates on prospects for economic growth [Dosse, 2007;Eichengreen, 2007]; exchange rates under conditions of open economy models, given global prices for raw materials [Manzur, 2018], including oil [Volkov, Yuhn, 2016]; predicting dynamics of exchange rate indices using ARMA models [Rout et al, 2014], including continuous ARMA models [Arratia, Cabana A., Cabana E., 2016] and GARCH models with modifications [Gupta, Kashyap, 2016;Barunik, Krehlik, Vacha, 2016]; applying neural networks for forecasting exchange rates [Liu, Hou, Liu, 2017;Zhenhua, Zezheng, Chao, 2016]; using the Support Vector Machine method and genetic algorithms to forecast daily exchange rates [Özorhan, Toroslu, Sehitoglu, 2017] or including panel data analysis, taking into account macroeconomic indicators and market volatility [Morales-Arias, Moura, 2013]. Some scholars draw attention to uncertainty in forecasting exchange rates [Kouwenberg, Markiewicz, Verhoeks, 2017;Detken, 2002], while others propose using cointegration methods and random processes models [Moosa, Vaz, 2016] predict exchange rates, including models taking into account incomplete information [Juselius, 2017]. It is worth noting the use of simulation, based on the Support Vector Machine method [Yuan, 2013] to improve the quality of forecasts based on random processes [Moosa, 2013].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%