2020
DOI: 10.11591/edulearn.v14i4.16094
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Model united nations (MUN): Learning method to enhance critical thinking skill and communication skill for high school students

Abstract: This research was Analysis Design Development Implementation Evaluation (ADDIE) development model with data collection that is student need analysis, product validation, implementation validation, and audience validation. Data collection from 59 high school students found 60% of students needed the development of a fun learning method and 92% wanted MUN to be applied to learning. The results of the product validation gained a score of 97.58% and the results of the validation of the implementation got 95% and t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Second, we directly addressed a local pressing need, that may be beneficial to other U.S. states or school districts, by identifying a number of additional research-based and/or recommended best practices that were mentioned is some of the plans. Such noteworthy practices included social and emotional interventions (e.g., affective curriculum; Rinn, 2020), culturally relevant pedagogy (Ladson-Billings, 2014), differentiated learning environments (Lee et al, 2021), early graduation (Plucker et al, 2022a, 2022b), leadership training (Meyer & Rinn, 2021), metacognitive skills (ElAdl & Polpol, 2020), Model UN (Khadzir & Sumarmi, 2020) and preassessments to inform differentiation (Wormeli, 2018). Some plans also included collaboration with other stakeholders besides general education teachers, such as EC, ELL, and technology teachers, administrators, and parents and families (Mofield, 2020).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Second, we directly addressed a local pressing need, that may be beneficial to other U.S. states or school districts, by identifying a number of additional research-based and/or recommended best practices that were mentioned is some of the plans. Such noteworthy practices included social and emotional interventions (e.g., affective curriculum; Rinn, 2020), culturally relevant pedagogy (Ladson-Billings, 2014), differentiated learning environments (Lee et al, 2021), early graduation (Plucker et al, 2022a, 2022b), leadership training (Meyer & Rinn, 2021), metacognitive skills (ElAdl & Polpol, 2020), Model UN (Khadzir & Sumarmi, 2020) and preassessments to inform differentiation (Wormeli, 2018). Some plans also included collaboration with other stakeholders besides general education teachers, such as EC, ELL, and technology teachers, administrators, and parents and families (Mofield, 2020).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When the relevant studies conducted abroad were examined, generally, they were experimental studies. Several studies report that the communication skills of secondary school students increased through various activities (Kim & Kim, 2016;Mardikawati & Mundilarto, 2020;Khadzir, 2020). However, few studies have studied the communication skills of secondary school students from a descriptive perspective.…”
Section: Discussion Regarding the First Research Questionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The average and final scores before treatment were 16.54 and 17.25. In addition, research by Al Khadzir and Sumarmi [29] revealed that by applying the model united nations (MUT) learning model, students scored a critical thinking ability of 82.58. Saptarini et al [30] found that individuals given an inappropriate learning model will not be learn actively, and their metacognitive abilities are not fully explored, leading to decreased learning outcomes.…”
Section: Cognitive Learning Outcomes and Critical Thinking Of Studentsmentioning
confidence: 99%