2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2013.09.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modeling and analysis of the material removal profile for free abrasive polishing with sub-aperture pad

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
23
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
1
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Dwell time at each dwell point is the product of the dwell time density at the point and the area enclosed by the point, of which the former can be obtained by various algorithms [27,28] and the later by Eq. (8). Dwell time at local dwell points (e.g.P(i)) is implemented during the path interval from P(i − 1/2) (the middle location between P(i − 1) and P(i)) to P(i + 1/2).…”
Section: Deterministic Correction Of the Pad Shapementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Dwell time at each dwell point is the product of the dwell time density at the point and the area enclosed by the point, of which the former can be obtained by various algorithms [27,28] and the later by Eq. (8). Dwell time at local dwell points (e.g.P(i)) is implemented during the path interval from P(i − 1/2) (the middle location between P(i − 1) and P(i)) to P(i + 1/2).…”
Section: Deterministic Correction Of the Pad Shapementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sub-aperture polishing processes are characterized by a small tool whose dwell time map on the optic is implemented by computer control, thus they are also known as computer controlled optical surfacing (CCOS). Various CCOS processes have been developed since the 1970s, such as small tool computer controlled polishing [7,8], Magnetorheological Finishing [9], ion beam finishing [10], and so forth [11,12]. These processes have brought great promotion of surface figure.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From the tribological perspective, free abrasive polishing belongs to a threebody wear mechanism, in which abrasive particles are free to roll and slide between two surfaces and cause wear on at least one of the two surfaces. 12,13 Compared to free abrasive polishing, abrasives are inlayed in the matrix in the fixed abrasive polishing to confirm that each particle has its own position. However, it is difficult to get the abrasives uniformly distributed in the tools, especially when ultrafine particles are aggregated together.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The abrasive particle size, the elastic modulus of the pad and the contact pressure played a 33 predominant role in wear depth. Fan et al [76] extended the model and studied not only the effects of conventional parameters used in prediction of free-abrasive process (FAP) like normal force, angular velocity, spindle speed but also investigated the effect of tool path curvature, grain size, polishing slurry properties.…”
Section: Materials Removal Models Using Grain-workpiece Interactionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Later the tool is retracted, and the machined surface is measured using a laser profilometer with a spacing of 100µm (resolution). 76 (a) (b) the shaft is in contact, the pressure and material removal keep increasing till 30N, and it is expected to increase further. A similar phenomenon that is observed in hard pad is also 78 observed in the soft pad, where for two different loading (15N and 25N) where the contact area increases by 57.62% for almost same maximum material removal depth of 198 µm ±4.24 µm.…”
Section: Process Parametersmentioning
confidence: 99%