2014
DOI: 10.3182/20140824-6-za-1003.01735
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modeling and Control of a Tiltrotor UAV for Path Tracking

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Finally, Cardoso et al (2016) presented a robust controller for this platform design and showed its pathtracking ability in a realistic simulation under external disturbances and model uncertainties. Donadel et al (2014) proposed a design where the tangential tiltings are fixed and the two radial tiltings are actuated, hence, again, n u = 2 + 2, with propellers' CoM also above the CoM of the platform as shown in Figure 2. They proposed a control approach relying on optimal H ' /H 2 techniques, which they validated in realistic simulations.…”
Section: Radial and Tangential Tilting Designsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, Cardoso et al (2016) presented a robust controller for this platform design and showed its pathtracking ability in a realistic simulation under external disturbances and model uncertainties. Donadel et al (2014) proposed a design where the tangential tiltings are fixed and the two radial tiltings are actuated, hence, again, n u = 2 + 2, with propellers' CoM also above the CoM of the platform as shown in Figure 2. They proposed a control approach relying on optimal H ' /H 2 techniques, which they validated in realistic simulations.…”
Section: Radial and Tangential Tilting Designsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Both algorithms were designed to control the UAV prototype shown in Figure 3 and both were compiled with the floating point operations being solved by software. They differ from each other on the control technique, one uses a common LQR strategy while the other uses a mix of H 2 e H∞ strategies with a feedforward control [11] to control a scenario where the UAV is carrying a load. An important characteristic is that both algorithms must be executed within a 12 millisenconds windows, otherwise the UAV may not stabilise.…”
Section: A Gem5 Simulation Platformmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To perform the control design, Backstepping and Integral Backstepping control strategies are used for the stabilization of tilt-rotor UAVs in [7] and [8]. In [9], the authors modelled and controlled a tilt-rotor UAV for path tracking. The linearized error model is obtained from the nonlinear model, which is used to synthesize a H∞ and a multi-objective H2/H∞ controllers by using the LMI approach.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%