2024
DOI: 10.5194/epsc2021-106
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modeling Campo del Cielo strewn field

Abstract: <p><strong>Description of the CdC</strong></p> <p>Campo del Cielo (CdC, Figure 1) is a 4000-year-old [1, 2] strewn field in the south of the Chaco province, Argentina, which was caused by an impact of IA iron octahedrite [3]. This strewn field has an extremely elongated pattern extending over an area of ~14 km (downrange) by ~3.5 km (lateral). Other known terrestrial strewn fields are much smaller: the Sikhote-Alin in Siberia is 1.2 km long,… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…South China is an important geographic branch of AASF (Figure 1b), because this area is the northern portion of this strewn field (Yan et al, 2022), and it corresponds to the uprange of the hypothesized impactor trajectory. Numerical simulations suggested that impact plume formed by an oblique impact would be inclined toward the downrange, so that much fewer impact melt that was engulfed in the impact plume was capable to form tektites at the uprange (Artemieva, 2013;Stöffler et al, 2002). Therefore, compared to most other Cenozoic tektites, AASF tektites at South China are unique in terms of locations, since they are located at the uprange and close to the hypothesized source crater (Ma et al, 2004;Whymark, 2021).…”
Section: Aasf Tektites At South Chinamentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…South China is an important geographic branch of AASF (Figure 1b), because this area is the northern portion of this strewn field (Yan et al, 2022), and it corresponds to the uprange of the hypothesized impactor trajectory. Numerical simulations suggested that impact plume formed by an oblique impact would be inclined toward the downrange, so that much fewer impact melt that was engulfed in the impact plume was capable to form tektites at the uprange (Artemieva, 2013;Stöffler et al, 2002). Therefore, compared to most other Cenozoic tektites, AASF tektites at South China are unique in terms of locations, since they are located at the uprange and close to the hypothesized source crater (Ma et al, 2004;Whymark, 2021).…”
Section: Aasf Tektites At South Chinamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…AASF was formed at 788.1 ± 3 ka ago (Jourdan et al., 2019), and its highly‐asymmetry geographic boundary (Figure 1a) indicates an oblique impact from north–northwest to south–southeast (Artemieva, 2008b). AASF may contain about 10 8 tons of tektites and microtektites (Glass, 1990), and the source impactor may be about 1 km in diameter (Artemieva, 2013; Goderis et al., 2017). The parent crater of AASF has an estimated diameter of over 30 km and depth of over several kilometers (Glass & Koeberl, 2006; Glass & Pizzuto, 1994; Prasad et al., 2007).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the entire strewn field, Muong Nong‐type tektites from South China exhibit the lowest average MS, and splash‐form tektites from South China exhibit the smallest average NRM and REM values, which are comparable with those of ablated splash‐form tektites from Australia (Pan et al., 2023a). Therefore, AASF tektites from South China may record different formation conditions compared to the rest of the strewn field, and their precursor impact melt might have experienced unique thermal history during cooling (Artemieva, 2013; Pan et al., 2023a).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%