2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.jimonfin.2010.06.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modeling exchange rate dependence dynamics at different time horizons

Abstract: Despite an extensive body of research, the best way to model the dependence of exchange rates remains an open question. In this paper we present a new approach which employs a flexible time-varying copula model. It allows the conditional correlation between exchange rates to be both time-varying and modeled independently from the marginal distributions. We introduce a dynamic specification for the correlation using the Fisher transformation. Applied to Euro/US dollar and Japanese Yen/US dollar, our results rev… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
56
1
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 87 publications
(62 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
4
56
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…These results relate to and are consistent with those of Breymann, Dias, and Embrechts (2003) and Dias and Embrechts (2007) in that the dependence structure changes as a function of the time horizon. These authors investigate highfrequency exchange rates at 6 different time horizons and find that the dependence structure is best described by a t-copula with successively larger degrees of freedom as the time horizon increases.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…These results relate to and are consistent with those of Breymann, Dias, and Embrechts (2003) and Dias and Embrechts (2007) in that the dependence structure changes as a function of the time horizon. These authors investigate highfrequency exchange rates at 6 different time horizons and find that the dependence structure is best described by a t-copula with successively larger degrees of freedom as the time horizon increases.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…In both periods, the DCC model seems to be very well specified, as the estimates of the DCC parameters, α and β, are always statistically significant indicating that the second moments of exchange returns are indeed time-varying; a feature documented in many studies (see, for instance, Dias and Embrechts, 2010). 10 The most interesting feature of Table 2 is that, on average, the magnitude of co-movements is lower in the post-euro period compared to the pre-euro period.…”
Section: Exchange Return Co-movementsmentioning
confidence: 70%
“…(d) Fisher : benchmark model of Dias and Embrechts (2010); (e) FIBase : benchmark model of Patton (2002Patton ( , 2006). …”
Section: Monte-carlo Designunclassified