2017
DOI: 10.1002/2017sw001602
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modeling Geomagnetically Induced Currents From Magnetometer Measurements: Spatial Scale Assessed With Reference Measurements

Abstract: Solar‐driven disturbances generate geomagnetically induced currents (GICs) that can result in power grid instability and, in the most extreme cases, even failure. Magnetometers provide direct measurements of the geomagnetic disturbance (GMD) effect on the surface magnetic field and GIC response can be determined from the power grid topology and engineering parameters. This paper considers this chain of models: transforming surface magnetic field disturbance to induced surface electric field through an electrom… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
19
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
1
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These observations suggest that event 4 just after 12 UT on 8 September 2017 has localized magnetic field fluctuations closer to Dunedin than Eyrewell, which is consistent with the proximity of the auroral electrojet to Dunedin as identified in Figure . This is also consistent with the power grid modeling of Butala et al (), who found that the fidelity between measured GIC levels and modeling using magnetometer proxies is a function of the distance between the two measurements, with shorter separation distances providing more successful modeling outcomes. However, Middlemarch shows a similar peak H′ to EYR (29 nT/min cf.…”
Section: Magnetic Field and Gic Perturbationssupporting
confidence: 88%
“…These observations suggest that event 4 just after 12 UT on 8 September 2017 has localized magnetic field fluctuations closer to Dunedin than Eyrewell, which is consistent with the proximity of the auroral electrojet to Dunedin as identified in Figure . This is also consistent with the power grid modeling of Butala et al (), who found that the fidelity between measured GIC levels and modeling using magnetometer proxies is a function of the distance between the two measurements, with shorter separation distances providing more successful modeling outcomes. However, Middlemarch shows a similar peak H′ to EYR (29 nT/min cf.…”
Section: Magnetic Field and Gic Perturbationssupporting
confidence: 88%
“…Overbye et al (2012) point out that the modeling of GIC will be greatly enhanced by comparison with observations. Butala et al (2017) provided comparison of observed and modeled transformer-level GIC using PowerWorld in the same network, also with a uniform electric field. In a further example, Shetye and Overbye (2015) modeled GIC in the same network using a single resistance for each substation.…”
Section: 1029/2018sw001814mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Investigations and improvements to conductivity models have been made by many, for example, Bedrosian and Love (2015), Schultz et al (2006) and Kelbert et al (2011). In a critical step to understand sources of uncertainty and error, comparisons of modeled GIC to neutral current measurements are beginning to be made (Butala et al, 2017;Kazerooni et al, 2013).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%