“…If the two categories for each task are mapped to different response keys, with both tasks involving the same pair of keys (e.g., living and small mapped to a left key; nonliving and large mapped to a right key; see Figure 1), then some targets will be congruent and require the same response regardless of the task (e.g., mosquito requires a left keypress response), and other targets will be incongruent and require different responses depending on the task (e.g., camel requires left and right keypress responses for the origin and size tasks, respectively). The response congruency effect is the finding of better performance for congruent targets than for incongruent targets (e.g., Brown, Reynolds, & Braver, 2007; Kiesel et al, 2007; Meiran & Kessler, 2008; Monsell, Sumner, & Waters, 2003; Schneider, 2014, 2015; Schneider & Logan, 2009, 2014; Sudevan & Taylor, 1987). The effect can arise from the mediated route if response selection is facilitated when the same response is activated by congruent target categories and impaired when different responses are activated by incongruent target categories.…”