2007
DOI: 10.1007/s11630-007-0208-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modeling of 3-D losses and deviations in a throughflow analysis tool

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Hence, this approach supplies the only two ultimate geometrical inputs that are required by the IBMfg approach: the blade local angle, and the thickness of the blade normal to the mean flow direction in the relative frame. Aerodynamic losses arising from the full blade geometry need to be modeled, using for example, standard turbomachinery loss models that occur in low order throughflow models (see (Simon and Léonard 2007)). Figure 7 shows the approach applied to a basic aerofoil.…”
Section: Immersed Boundary Methods With Optional Filtered Geometry (Ibmfg)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hence, this approach supplies the only two ultimate geometrical inputs that are required by the IBMfg approach: the blade local angle, and the thickness of the blade normal to the mean flow direction in the relative frame. Aerodynamic losses arising from the full blade geometry need to be modeled, using for example, standard turbomachinery loss models that occur in low order throughflow models (see (Simon and Léonard 2007)). Figure 7 shows the approach applied to a basic aerofoil.…”
Section: Immersed Boundary Methods With Optional Filtered Geometry (Ibmfg)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Pacciani et al 19,20 studied the 3D flow features modeling issues in the time-marching throughflow model. Further developments lead to Navier-Stokesbased throughflow codes 21,22 and progresses in modeling the effects of 3D loss. In these solvers, the use of classical loss models must be carefully addressed in order to avoid accounting for the same losses twice.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[1,13]. These solvers use finite volume formulation for the circumferentially averaged three-dimensional transport equations unlike to their predecessors, which were based on streamline curvature or stream function methods and which were not able to handle precisely transonic flow.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%