2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.memsci.2005.12.041
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modeling of a radial flow hollow fiber module and estimation of model parameters for aqueous multi-component mixture using numerical techniques

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
(76 reference statements)
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In particular, it is expected that the analysis to be simpler for the cases where the solutes present in the solution are non-interacting. Otherwise the interactions between the solutes will have to be taken into account as shown by Senthilmurugan and Gupta [38].…”
Section: Influence Of Operating Conditions On Power Densitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In particular, it is expected that the analysis to be simpler for the cases where the solutes present in the solution are non-interacting. Otherwise the interactions between the solutes will have to be taken into account as shown by Senthilmurugan and Gupta [38].…”
Section: Influence Of Operating Conditions On Power Densitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(31) is substituted in Eq. (22), the position of the inversion point corresponds to the solution of:…”
Section: General Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nevertheless, the experimental results show that the pressure in the shell varies when a recirculation flux is used in the shell. Thus, different researchers have considered that the flow in the shell could be simulated by empirical equations as Ergun's equation [19,21,22], although other empirical equations have been used [1]. Other authors [18,23,24] have simulated the flux in the shell by considering laminar flow.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This assumption is valid when dilute feed solutions are used. 40,41 • Differences in sugar rejections due to fouling are not taken into account. Membrane fouling might have either a positive or a negative influence on rejection, 42 which may play a role for more hydrophobic components.…”
Section: Modelling Assumptionsmentioning
confidence: 99%