2009
DOI: 10.1007/s11434-009-0431-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modeling of ultrasound contrast agents bubble dynamics with modified surface tension coefficient

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The high compressibility and low density of the microbubbles made them highly echogenic (Riess 2003, Al-Sahhaf et al 2002, Phillips et al 1998. However, the early agents were lost within a short period of time because they quickly dissolved into the blood under high ultrasound and arterial pressures (Hoff et al 2000, Zheng et al 2009.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The high compressibility and low density of the microbubbles made them highly echogenic (Riess 2003, Al-Sahhaf et al 2002, Phillips et al 1998. However, the early agents were lost within a short period of time because they quickly dissolved into the blood under high ultrasound and arterial pressures (Hoff et al 2000, Zheng et al 2009.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The second generation of UCAs were produced in an attempt to increase the lifespan of the agents in vivo whilst not sacrificing the high echogenicity (Hoff et al 2000, Zheng et al 2009, Ye 1996, Allen et al 2001, which is characteristic of the microbubble contrast agents. A range of commercially available agents were produced that consisted of a microbubble protected by a thin layer of albumin or lipid.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In the present study, the surface tension coefficient is assumed to be constant. However, the surface tension coefficient is varied with bubble radius with lower and upper limits [15], which is needed to be considered in future work.…”
Section: The Effect Of Ultrasound Pnp Valuesmentioning
confidence: 99%