1999
DOI: 10.1063/1.369605
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modeling the optical constants of HgxCd1−xTe alloys in the 1.5–6.0 eV range

Abstract: Articles you may be interested inAnalytical modeling and numerical simulation of P+-Hg0.69 Cd0.31Te/n-Hg0.78Cd0.22Te/CdZnTe heterojunction photodetector for a long-wavelength infrared free space optical communication systemThe optical constants of Hg x Cd 1Ϫx Te as a function of energy and composition x are modeled over a wide spectral range from 1.5 to 6 eV. The model employed represents an extension of Adachi's model and incorporates the adjustable broadening function rather than the conventional Lorentzian … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The X-rays produced by the 55 Fe source are predominantly Mn KL 2 +KL 3 X-rays with energy 5.89 keV (Deslattes et al 2003(Deslattes et al , 2005, which in Hg 1−x Cd x Te with x = 0.445 have an opacity of 523 cm 2 g −1 (Berger et al 2010); at the absorber density of ρ = 7.07 g cm −3 (Capper 1994), this corresponds to an absorption depth of (κρ) −1 = 2.7 μm, or about half of the thickness of the Hg 1−x Cd x Te absorber. In contrast, the absorption depth of a photon at 500 nm in Hg 1−x Cd x Te is 28 nm (Djurišić & Li 1999; in practice, such a photon may be absorbed in the buffer layer). We thus anticipate that holes released by X-ray absorption events likely travel only part way through the absorbing layer, and thus on average may give a lower charge diffusion length than a measurement with visible light.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The X-rays produced by the 55 Fe source are predominantly Mn KL 2 +KL 3 X-rays with energy 5.89 keV (Deslattes et al 2003(Deslattes et al , 2005, which in Hg 1−x Cd x Te with x = 0.445 have an opacity of 523 cm 2 g −1 (Berger et al 2010); at the absorber density of ρ = 7.07 g cm −3 (Capper 1994), this corresponds to an absorption depth of (κρ) −1 = 2.7 μm, or about half of the thickness of the Hg 1−x Cd x Te absorber. In contrast, the absorption depth of a photon at 500 nm in Hg 1−x Cd x Te is 28 nm (Djurišić & Li 1999; in practice, such a photon may be absorbed in the buffer layer). We thus anticipate that holes released by X-ray absorption events likely travel only part way through the absorbing layer, and thus on average may give a lower charge diffusion length than a measurement with visible light.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, the E 1 critical point of 2.5 μm cutoff HgCdTe is at 1/λ = E 1 /hc = 2.0 μm −1 and dominates absorption of 500 nm light(Djurišić & Li 1999), whereas for 5 μm cutoff HgCdTe this critical point only shifts down to 1.9 μm −1(Viña et al 1984).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%