2022
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1009837
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modelling brain representations of abstract concepts

Abstract: conceptual representations are critical for human cognition. Despite their importance, key properties of these representations remain poorly understood. Here, we used computational models of distributional semantics to predict multivariate fMRI activity patterns during the activation and contextualization of abstract concepts. We devised a task in which participants had to embed abstract nouns into a story that they developed around a given background context. We found that representations in inferior parietal… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
6
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 72 publications
1
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our findings support the previously described encoding-retrieval distinction and suggest that it is primarily conceptual information (Fig. 2b) that is represented in parietal regions during retrieval, in line with previous work showing strong object identity - and even abstract concept coding in parietal cortex (Ferreira et al, 2019; Jeong & Xu, 2016; Kaiser et al, 2022). The involvement of parietal networks is also discussed further below in relation to the timing of the reactivation.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…Our findings support the previously described encoding-retrieval distinction and suggest that it is primarily conceptual information (Fig. 2b) that is represented in parietal regions during retrieval, in line with previous work showing strong object identity - and even abstract concept coding in parietal cortex (Ferreira et al, 2019; Jeong & Xu, 2016; Kaiser et al, 2022). The involvement of parietal networks is also discussed further below in relation to the timing of the reactivation.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…As a result, this approach is relevant in work using semantic similarity metrics to identify brain networks which support different representations (e.g., abstract and concrete concepts, taxonomic and thematic concepts, nouns and verbs; cf. Akinina et al, 2019; Kaiser et al, 2022; Schwartz et al, 2009, 2011; Wang et al, 2018), to categorize neurological disease (e.g., primary progressive aphasia variants, poststroke aphasia, cf. Budd et al, 2010; Jefferies & Lambon Ralph, 2006; Reilly et al, 2011), to identify the level of naming deficits (e.g., Caramazza, 1997; Dell et al, 1997; Walker et al, 2018), and to understand the efficacy of language treatment (e.g., Kristinsson et al, 2021; Leonard et al, 2015; Miceli et al, 1996; Nickels & Best, 1996).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This form often involves dynamically imagining and articulating structured narratives, such as delivering a speech. Situationally simulated inner speech involved (1) a process of inner speech, (2) the integration of contextual background, episodic and semantic memories, past experiences, and upcoming events to construct contextually coherent narratives (Andrews, 2016(Andrews, , 2014Kaiser et al, 2022), and (3) the representation of complex and dynamic information, contrasting with simple imagining of vowels, consonants, tones, and words. Despite extensive research on the neural mechanisms of inner speech more generally (Alderson-Day & Fernyhough, 2015;Fernyhough & Borghi, 2023;Grandchamp et al, 2019;Perrone-Bertolotti et al, 2014 ), the neural mechanisms underlying situationally simulated inner speech remain largely unknown.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To validate these hypotheses, we conducted dynamic activation and connectivity analyses on an fMRI dataset (Kaiser et al, 2022) comprising 10 sessions of situationally simulated inner speech. In each session, participants were presented with 61 abstract words and instructed to mentally incorporate them into a cohesive narrative within a predefined contextual backdrop.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%