2022
DOI: 10.1177/13694332221124618
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modelling of extreme uniform temperature for high-speed railway bridge piers using maximum entropy and field monitoring

Abstract: Due to the atmospheric temperature and solar radiation, the effects of temperature variation in bridge structures should be considered. Such variation induces notable deformations and movements, jeopardizing the safety of bridges and high-speed trains operations. However, the temperature action is a random process and its distribution is difficult to determine. The existing methods for analyzing structural temperatures are insufficient to meet the precision requirement. Therefore, the accurate prediction of ex… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
2
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The uniform components and the gradients are mainly concerned. Similar studies on temperature distributions in beam bridges were also conducted by other researchers (Abid, 2015; Branco and Mendes, 1993; Dai et al, 2022; Fu et al, 1990; Froli et al, 1996; Ho and Liu, 1989; Kennedy and Soliman, 1987; Kromanis et al, 2015; Mirambell and Aguado, 1990; Potgieter and Gamble, 1983; Roeder, 2003; Tong et al, 2001; Wollman et al, 2002; Zhang et al, 2021a). These studies are summarized in Table 2.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 76%
“…The uniform components and the gradients are mainly concerned. Similar studies on temperature distributions in beam bridges were also conducted by other researchers (Abid, 2015; Branco and Mendes, 1993; Dai et al, 2022; Fu et al, 1990; Froli et al, 1996; Ho and Liu, 1989; Kennedy and Soliman, 1987; Kromanis et al, 2015; Mirambell and Aguado, 1990; Potgieter and Gamble, 1983; Roeder, 2003; Tong et al, 2001; Wollman et al, 2002; Zhang et al, 2021a). These studies are summarized in Table 2.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 76%
“…Compared with the GEV, the MaxEnt model is more stable and significantly more robust in the variation in sample sizes, indicating that the MaxEnt model reduces the outcome uncertainty and avoids the high risk of bias. This robustness of the MaxEnt for the sample sizes has also been demonstrated by Dai et al [ 37 ]. Therefore, the MaxEnt model is adopted in this paper to determine the extreme temperatures of cables.…”
Section: The Cross-sectional Distribution and The Time-history Curve ...supporting
confidence: 72%
“…According to Dai et al [ 37 ], the MaxEnt model is expressed as where ln represents the natural logarithm and f ( x ) is a probability distribution function that satisfies the following constraint conditions: where D is the integration interval, r is the order of the moments used, and m i is the i -th order origin moment of the sample. Then, by introducing the Lagrangian function and corresponding multipliers λ i , the expression of the MaxEnt probability density function (PDF) is obtained as whose cumulative distribution function (CDF) is …”
Section: The Cross-sectional Distribution and The Time-history Curve ...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Exposed to ambient temperature and solar radiation, bridges are subjected to daily and seasonal thermal effects (Dai et al, 2022; Xia et al, 2022; Li et al, 2023). Variations in structural temperature are likely to induce deformations and stresses, especially for long-span cable-stayed bridges.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%