Modelling push‐pull management of pest insects using repellents and attractive traps in fruit tree orchards

Abstract

BACKGROUND Push‐pull with semiochemicals in pest management uses repellents to reduce response of pests to food‐mate resources (push) and attractive traps to reduce populations (pull). Simulation models of push‐pull can aid understanding of plant‐insect interactions in nature and suggest hypotheses for field tests that improve management. A previous model indicated advantages of push‐pull for controlling ambrosia beetle, Euwallacea fornicatus, pest of avocado trees. However, the simulated behavior of repellency was inconsistent with field observations. RESULTS We simulated individual‐based movement of insects in push‐pull to reveal relationships between parameters of radii (strength) of attractive traps, pest aggregations, and repellents with densities of each in an avocado orchard to visualize and understand the interactions and significance. Simulations indicated placement of traps along a 1‐ha area periphery as a barrier resulted in similar trapping and mating as when traps were in a grid, either when insects originated randomly inside the plot or came from outside the plot. However, when insects originated from outside, both arrangements caught slightly more than when insects originated within the plot. CONCLUSION There were no differences in capture rates whether traps were spaced in a barrier along the plot's periphery or in a grid covering the plot. Push‐pull was more effective than pull (mass trapping) alone. Repellent behavior of individuals when encountering a repellent radius was modelled by approximate 90° turns (right or left at random) when about to enter an infestation, consistent with earlier observations of effects of repellents on bark beetles orienting to aggregation pheromone. © 2022 Society of Chemical Industry.

Tree Communication: the Effects of “Wired” and “Wireless” Channels on Interactions with Herbivores

“…Trees in managed forests could be matched with lower story plants that may provide them with odorous camouflage. Moreover, modification of the "push-pull" strategy utilized in subsistence farming could be developed for forests by choosing companion plants that release infochemicals that avert insect pests from trees combined with trap plants that act as a "pull" component [155]. The effectiveness of this system has been proven in agricultural systems and is increasingly adopted by farmers [156] suggesting potential for management of pests in forest ecosystems.…”

Host Volatiles Potentially Drive Two Evolutionarily Related Weevils to Select Different Grains

“…Attractants and repellents could be better choices to address the side effects of insecticides [13,14]. Designing attractants and repellents for pests is based on the understanding of their olfactory mechanisms for locating food sources or mates by scent [15,16].…”

Developing an Effective Push–Pull System for Managing Outbreaks of the Invasive Pest Bactrocera dorsalis (Diptera: Tephritidae) in Nephelium lappaceum Orchards

“…The first involves planting non-crop plants with repellent properties and combining them with trap crops [25]. The second approach utilizes the combination of repellents and attractants to lure and trap pests [26]. Usually, non-toxic components are used in the push-pull strategy, aiming to reduce pesticide usage, while combining different stimuli and coordinating pest distributions to enhance efficiency [20].…”