Scale and Complexity in Plant Systems Research
DOI: 10.1007/1-4020-5906-x_10
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modelling the Genetic Basis of Response Curves Underlying Genotype × Environment Interaction

Abstract: Abstract.To increase tolerance to abiotic stresses in breeding programmes, typically families and collections of genotypes are evaluated in series of trials (environments) representing different levels of stress. The statistical analysis of the data from such trials concentrates on modelling the phenotypic behaviour of the genotypes across the set of environments. This phenotypic behaviour can be modelled in the form of genotype-specific linear and non-linear response curves in relation to environmental charac… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0
1

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
15
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Upon the collection of additional genotypic information in the form of measurements describing plant development or information relating to gene and metabolic expression, a next step in modeling could be the fitting of statistical models containing increased biological realism. Such models would immediately become nonlinear (Ma et al 2002;Malosetti et al 2006;Van Eeuwijk et al 2007). Of course, from a biological point of view, nonlinear QTL models are still simplified representations of the interacting biological and environmental components of the dynamic plant system (Hammer et al 2006), but for most applied prediction purposes, like marker-assisted breeding, such nonlinear models would represent an improvement over the present linear models.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Upon the collection of additional genotypic information in the form of measurements describing plant development or information relating to gene and metabolic expression, a next step in modeling could be the fitting of statistical models containing increased biological realism. Such models would immediately become nonlinear (Ma et al 2002;Malosetti et al 2006;Van Eeuwijk et al 2007). Of course, from a biological point of view, nonlinear QTL models are still simplified representations of the interacting biological and environmental components of the dynamic plant system (Hammer et al 2006), but for most applied prediction purposes, like marker-assisted breeding, such nonlinear models would represent an improvement over the present linear models.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More generally, the phenotypic behavior can be modeled in the form of QTL-dependent response curves to the environmental characterizations (Hammer et al 2006;Malosetti et al 2006;Van Eeuwijk et al 2007). These response curves are expected to have nonlinear forms, but limited environmental information will typically allow only linear approximations to these curves.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Those QTLs with their closest markers placed within 10 cM from each other and their support intervals showing partial or complete overlap were considered to be present in a QTL cluster. The additive effects (AE) and the IPCA1 and IPCA2 values (I1 and I2, respectively) computed from the AMMI analysis were also included in QTL mapping (Van Eeuwijk et al, 2007) in order to evaluate the presence of additive and environmentally modulated loci.…”
Section: Qtl Analysesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One of the most important applications of this type of study is the possibility to incorporate architecture-derived information into breeding programs to make them more effective. It also allows a better understanding of the genetic correlation among traits (Jiang and Zeng 1995;Mackay 2001), the interaction between genotypes and environments (Malosetti et al 2004van Eeuwijk et al 2005van Eeuwijk et al , 2007van Eeuwijk et al , 2009Boer et al 2007;Mathews et al 2008;Messmer et al 2009;Pastina et al 2012), and the determination of the breeding value of individuals for marker-assisted selection Zeng et al 1999;Dekkers and Hospital 2002;Hospital 2009).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%