2001
DOI: 10.1016/s0143-7496(01)00009-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modelling the stress vector continuity at the interface of bonded joints

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0
2

Year Published

2005
2005
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
13
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…With the standard finite element method, based on the variational principal of minimum potential energy whose single variable is the displacement field, the continuity of the displacement is satisfied but the continuity of the stress vector is not exactly verified. Therefore, refined meshes are also needed near the interface in order to obtain good numerical results especially for large material heterogeneity of the assemblies [20,21]. Results are presented, in the case of tension-shear loadings, for two angles of the beak (''90": right angle, ''45": beak with an angle of 45°) and for three geometries of the edge of the adhesive joint (''O": outer or ''convex" edge; ''S": straight edge; ''I": inner or ''concave" edge).…”
Section: Parameters Of the Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With the standard finite element method, based on the variational principal of minimum potential energy whose single variable is the displacement field, the continuity of the displacement is satisfied but the continuity of the stress vector is not exactly verified. Therefore, refined meshes are also needed near the interface in order to obtain good numerical results especially for large material heterogeneity of the assemblies [20,21]. Results are presented, in the case of tension-shear loadings, for two angles of the beak (''90": right angle, ''45": beak with an angle of 45°) and for three geometries of the edge of the adhesive joint (''O": outer or ''convex" edge; ''S": straight edge; ''I": inner or ''concave" edge).…”
Section: Parameters Of the Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One can see that calculation of a brazed assembly with an elastic behavior is flawed. [8] Correct study of brazed assembly must be carried out under elastoplastic assumption.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With the standard finite element method, based on the variational principal of minimum potential energy whose unique variable is the displacement field, the continuity of the displacement is satisfied but the continuity of the stress vector is not exactly verified. Therefore refined meshes are also needed near the interface, in order to obtain good numerical results, especially for large material heterogeneity of the structure [20]. After verifying this, different shapes of the edge of the adhesive joint have been studied.…”
Section: Analysis Of the Variability Of Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%