2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.chroma.2010.12.053
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Models for liquid–liquid partition in the system propylene carbonate–organic solvent and their use for estimating descriptors for organic compounds

Abstract: Partition coefficients for varied compounds were determined for the organic solvent-propylene carbonate biphasic partition system where the organic solvent is n-heptane, isopentyl ether or 1-octanol. These partition coefficient databases are analyzed using the solvation parameter model facilitating a quantitative comparison of the propylene carbonate-based partition systems with other totally organic partition systems. Propylene carbonate is a weak to intermediate cohesive solvent, reasonably dipolar/polarizab… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For several of the comparisons the author likely utilized solute parameters/properties rather than solvent parameters/properties because the required information was not readily available. This was particularly true in the case of the Abraham model as solvent parameters (called process or solvent equation coefficients) had been determined for about 300 water/organic solvent, air/organic solvent, and totally organic solvents biphasic partitioning systems [2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20]. Abraham model solvent equation coefficients were not available for solvents such as acetic acid, pyridine, propionitrile, diethyl phthalate, limonene, α-pinene, α-terpineol, glycerol and 1,3-propanediol.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For several of the comparisons the author likely utilized solute parameters/properties rather than solvent parameters/properties because the required information was not readily available. This was particularly true in the case of the Abraham model as solvent parameters (called process or solvent equation coefficients) had been determined for about 300 water/organic solvent, air/organic solvent, and totally organic solvents biphasic partitioning systems [2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20]. Abraham model solvent equation coefficients were not available for solvents such as acetic acid, pyridine, propionitrile, diethyl phthalate, limonene, α-pinene, α-terpineol, glycerol and 1,3-propanediol.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For liquid-phase microextraction, solvent evaporation is rarely required, and this restriction on solvent selection no longer applies. This should allow a wider choice of solvents with different selectivity to be exploited as demonstrated for formamide [9] and propylene carbonate [10] with n-heptane, 1,2-dichloroethane, isopentyl ether, or 1-octanol as counter solvents. In this report, we investigate the use of ethylene glycol as a base solvent for liquid-liquid partition employing different counter solvents to extend the selectivity range of totally organic biphasic systems currently available.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The system constants and their ratios provide a quantitative description of system properties in terms of the intermolecular interactions responsible for solvation and facilitate a comparison of their properties to other biphasic solvent systems [7][8][9][10][11]. They are also required for the calculation of solute descriptors by liquid-liquid partition [7,11,16,17].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations