2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2014.10.052
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modification of the Beckman-Coulter second-generation enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay protocol improves the reliability of serum antimüllerian hormone measurement

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
21
0
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
1
21
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Here, the median magnitude shift was 68.0 % (range 3.4 to 283.3 %), although if interference from complement is to blame, this shift may not be as large for nonpregnant samples as complement levels are higher during pregnancy [18]. Our study is supported by a recent publication by Craciunas et al [19], who compared 156 samples from women undergoing subfertility investigation and found that samples with the revised protocol read on average 51.4 % higher than the original protocol. In contrast, Welsh et al [20] found insubstantial differences for 37 non-pregnant serum samples measured with the original and revised Gen II protocol.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 85%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Here, the median magnitude shift was 68.0 % (range 3.4 to 283.3 %), although if interference from complement is to blame, this shift may not be as large for nonpregnant samples as complement levels are higher during pregnancy [18]. Our study is supported by a recent publication by Craciunas et al [19], who compared 156 samples from women undergoing subfertility investigation and found that samples with the revised protocol read on average 51.4 % higher than the original protocol. In contrast, Welsh et al [20] found insubstantial differences for 37 non-pregnant serum samples measured with the original and revised Gen II protocol.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 85%
“…It should also be noted that additional confusion is likely to arise from which protocol version a laboratory has used given that the manufacturer has not clearly labelled the protocol change, either by updating the kit name or protocol version. Consequently, Craciunas et al [19] have suggested distinguishing protocol versions by naming the revised Gen II protocol as Gen IIm (for Gen II modified).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In 2013, the modified protocol for second-generation assay for AMH was released (Gen IIm). It included a predilution step of the specimen in assay buffer before addition to the ELISA plate, which gave more reliable AMH results [55]. Currently, fully automatic measurements of serum AMH concentrations are also available (Elecsys, AMH, Roche and Access, AMH, Beckman Coulter) [56].…”
Section: Amh In Pcos Diagnosismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Następnie, te metody zostały zastąpione metodą ELISA II generacji przygotowaną przez laboratorium Beckman Coulter [54]. W 2013 roku wprowadzono modyfikację do oznaczeń II generacji, która polegała na dodatkowym rozcieńczeniu próbki, co dawało bardziej wiarygodne oznaczenia stężenia AMH w badanym materiale [55]. Obecnie, dostępne są w pełni zautomatyzowane metody do oznaczenia stężeń AMH w materiale biologicznym (Elecsys AMH, Roche oraz Acess, AMH, Beckam Coulter) [56].…”
Section: Amh W Diagnostyce Pcosunclassified
“…In contrast documentation from Beckman Coulter suggests equivalent values of the Access AMH assay to those reported by the AMH Gen II ELISA. To date we are unaware of any external validation of the performance of these two new automated AMH assays (Beckman Coulter Access AMH assay and the Roche Diagnostics Elecsys AMH assay) relative each other and to the two current clinical standard assays (Beckman Coulter Generation II ELISA and the Ansh Labs ultrasensitive AMH/MIS ELISA).The importance of such post-marketing external validation has previously been highlighted by the release of field safety notices by Beckman Coulter, when laboratories observed discordance between anticipated and actual results (8,14,15). To address this urgent need for external validation we have used a pragmatic design and compared the performance of all four AMH assays utilizing patients referred for assisted conception.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%