2013
DOI: 10.1139/cgj-2012-0308
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modified expression for the failure criterion of bucket foundations subjected to combined loading

Abstract: Recently, various loading tests with small- and large-scale bucket foundations were performed on buckets of varying sizes, embedment ratios, and load paths with saturated dense Aalborg University Sand No. 1 at the geotechnical laboratory of Aalborg University. In the present study, the capacity and behavior of bucket foundations subjected to combined loads were investigated on the basis of the results of these experimental studies. Although previous authors had proposed a linear relationship between the moment… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
24
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
1
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Panayides et al [22] developed the results of a numerical study into the bearing capacity and failure mechanisms of suction caissons founded in structured clays using an advanced soil constitutive model. Larsen et al [23] investigated the behavior of suction buckets with varying sizes, aspect ratios, and load paths under combined loads using the results of experimental studies on the saturated dense Aalborg University Sand. Foglia et al [24] formulated and validated a macro-element model for suction buckets against small-scale experimental results.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Panayides et al [22] developed the results of a numerical study into the bearing capacity and failure mechanisms of suction caissons founded in structured clays using an advanced soil constitutive model. Larsen et al [23] investigated the behavior of suction buckets with varying sizes, aspect ratios, and load paths under combined loads using the results of experimental studies on the saturated dense Aalborg University Sand. Foglia et al [24] formulated and validated a macro-element model for suction buckets against small-scale experimental results.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, such structures have been developed extensively in Europe (e.g., see [27,2,[4][5][6][7]29,22,23,24,9,15,28]). Foundation concepts that are frequently used for offshore wind turbines include monopiles, jackets, and tension-leg floating substructures.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Due to the main features of high load capability Larsen et al, 2013;Liu et al, 2015;Zhu et al, 2011), self-float (Le et al, 2013) and nearly 20% lower cost than other types of foundations such as monopile and jacket-up, bucket foundation, as a novel foundation, has already been applied to offshore wind turbine. Additionally, to be a good alternative for conventional transportation and installation of offshore wind turbine, a dedicated vessel for bucket foundation is designed by evading the offshore assembly with the following stages: the onshore erection stage and the offshore integrated transportation and installation stages (see Fig.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%