2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.jnucmat.2012.08.048
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modified Monkman–Grant relationship for austenitic stainless steel foils

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There is a linear correspondence between the logarithmic applied stress and the logarithmic creep rupture lifetime. An inverse linear relationship is found between the creep rupture life and the creep rate by Monkman and Grant, which is named as the Monkman-Grant relationship (Ali and Tamin, 2013). A constant (M ∼ 0.09) is obtained.…”
Section: Creep Behaviormentioning
confidence: 93%
“…There is a linear correspondence between the logarithmic applied stress and the logarithmic creep rupture lifetime. An inverse linear relationship is found between the creep rupture life and the creep rate by Monkman and Grant, which is named as the Monkman-Grant relationship (Ali and Tamin, 2013). A constant (M ∼ 0.09) is obtained.…”
Section: Creep Behaviormentioning
confidence: 93%
“…C MG and C MMG are regarded as constants independent of temperature and applied stress for the particular alloy. [9,11,12] Hassan et al [13] pointed out that MGR is suitable for alloys where the secondary creep stage is the main creep stage, while MMGR is more suitable for alloys when the tertiary stage becomes the main creep stage. In the case of PM superalloys with outstanding high-temperature performance, the prevailing phenomenon typically manifests as the predominance of the tertiary creep stage.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%