2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.molstruc.2011.12.026
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Molecular dynamics and mesoscopic dynamics simulations for prediction of miscibility in polypropylene/polyamide-11 blends

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
34
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 61 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
0
34
0
Order By: Relevance
“…17 Experimental studies of the dissolution of low molecular weight resist fragments are challenging due to their small size and low concentration in solution. De Arenaza et al 32 and Fu et al 33 have also used Accelrys Materials Studio for calculating the v parameter for various polymer blends. Molecular dynamics (MD) simulation is a suitable technique that can be used to meet this challenge.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…17 Experimental studies of the dissolution of low molecular weight resist fragments are challenging due to their small size and low concentration in solution. De Arenaza et al 32 and Fu et al 33 have also used Accelrys Materials Studio for calculating the v parameter for various polymer blends. Molecular dynamics (MD) simulation is a suitable technique that can be used to meet this challenge.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Figure 8 shows g(r) of the atomic pairs of (N-PBS)-CMC and (N-PBS)-HEC composites. The peak distributions value, r of less than 0.5 nm for both composites, reveals the existence of intermolecular and intra-molecular interaction between composites [34]. The values from 0 to 0.13 nm indicate covalent forces between It is worth mentioning that g(r) of (N -PBS)-HEC composite i s higher than t hat of (N-PBS)-CMC composite.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…It is worth mentioning that the comparison of the free energy density values between S 1 and S 3 is totally meaningless because it is not routinely calculated for real systems. 33 While in this case, the value of free energy change (|DG|) before and aer the aggregation could reect the stability of microemulsion to some extent. As shown in Fig.…”
Section: Effect Of Emulsier/isoamyl Acetate Mass Ratio (K)mentioning
confidence: 96%