2019
DOI: 10.1021/acs.jcim.8b00857
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Molecular Modeling Investigation of the Interaction between Humicola insolens Cutinase and SDS Surfactant Suggests a Mechanism for Enzyme Inactivation

Abstract: One of the largest commercial applications of enzymes and surfactants is as main components in modern detergents. The high concentration of surfactant compounds usually present in detergents can, however, negatively affect the enzymatic activity. To remedy this drawback, it is of great importance to characterize the interaction between the enzyme and the surfactant molecules at an atomistic resolution. The protein enzyme cutinase from the thermophilic and saprophytic fungus called Humicola insolens (HiC) is a … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This is a clustering method for the identification of clusters of protein residues making simultaneous contacts with a ligand through an MD trajectory. , It uses a distance metric based on the surprisal of a pair of residues to be in contact with a ligand: d ( i , j ) = −log­(( n ( i , j ) + 1)/ N ), where n ( i , j ) is the number of simultaneous contacts for residues i and j over a trajectory containing N frames. Note that d ( i , j ) ∼ 0 and d ( i , j ) = log­( N ) correspond to residues i and j always in contact with the ligand and no simultaneous contacts throughout the trajectory, respectively.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This is a clustering method for the identification of clusters of protein residues making simultaneous contacts with a ligand through an MD trajectory. , It uses a distance metric based on the surprisal of a pair of residues to be in contact with a ligand: d ( i , j ) = −log­(( n ( i , j ) + 1)/ N ), where n ( i , j ) is the number of simultaneous contacts for residues i and j over a trajectory containing N frames. Note that d ( i , j ) ∼ 0 and d ( i , j ) = log­( N ) correspond to residues i and j always in contact with the ligand and no simultaneous contacts throughout the trajectory, respectively.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Phrases clustering analysis: This is a clustering method for the identification of clusters of protein residues making simultaneous contacts with a ligand through an MD trajectory 51,52 . It uses a distance metric based on the surprisal of a pair of residues to be in contact with a ligand:…”
Section: Analysis Detailsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The main emphasis of the work is to define the basis of interaction between the protein and SDS in order to understand how SDS may reduce its activity. The results suggest a mechanism of cutinase inhibition by SDS, which involves the nucleation of aggregates of SDS molecules on hydrophobic patches on the cutinase surface …”
mentioning
confidence: 88%
“…P45 [53], in both cases, the Triton X-100 acted by destabilizing the enzymatic structure. In contrast, the SDS that is cited in the literature as an enzyme inhibitor [54] stimulated protease activity (Table 2). Proteases from Bacillus safensis CK [55] and Bacillus pumilus D3 [56] in the presence of SDS also showed an increase in the values of enzyme activity, demonstrating that the inhibitor did not have a negative effect on these enzymes.…”
Section: Characterization Of the Alkaline Protease Of B Rmus Obtained In Fed-batchmentioning
confidence: 99%