2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.clay.2018.01.019
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Molecular modeling on transportation of CO 2 in montmorillonite: Diffusion and permeation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
6
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
1
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The diffusion coefficients of cations are relatively lower than those of intercalates because of stronger water− cation and cation−surface interactions. The calculated diffusion coefficients of intercalates and cations are in reasonable agreement with experimental values obtained using QENS and neutron spin echo experiments on smectites 103,128 and earlier MD simulations. 94,99 Time Correlation Function.…”
Section: ■ Results and Discussionsupporting
confidence: 85%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The diffusion coefficients of cations are relatively lower than those of intercalates because of stronger water− cation and cation−surface interactions. The calculated diffusion coefficients of intercalates and cations are in reasonable agreement with experimental values obtained using QENS and neutron spin echo experiments on smectites 103,128 and earlier MD simulations. 94,99 Time Correlation Function.…”
Section: ■ Results and Discussionsupporting
confidence: 85%
“…101,102 Another MD study examined the permeability of CO 2 /H 2 O in Na-MMT and showed that the diffusion of the intercalates increases with increase in water concentration. 103 coefficient of CO 2 was independent of the charge-balancing cations in the interlayers. 94 Marami et al performed MD and multiphase GCMC simulations to characterize the free energy of swelling of Na-MMT and Na-beidellite (Na-BEI) in the presence of H 2 O/CO 2 .…”
Section: ■ Introductionmentioning
confidence: 88%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…At present, the main CO 2 separation technologies include chemical absorption, physical adsorption, cryogenic separation, and membrane separation. Materials having the potential to capture CO 2 such as activated carbons, zeolites, aqueous amine, nanosilicate clay minerals, metal–organic frameworks, liquid membranes, and hydrate slurries have been investigated. These technologies all have their own disadvantages, such as an unfriendly environment, high energy consumption, high investment cost, and low separation capacity. For this reason, researchers are still working hard to explore new technologies.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Experimental studies on permeability measurements of clay, however, are limited with regard to the parameter spaces explored (e.g., porosity, water saturation, clay types, and surface chemistry) and are sensitive to minute artifacts as a result of the low permeability (Best & Katsube, 1995; Keller et al, 2013; Kwon et al, 2004). Therefore, microscale models are often used to explore the hydraulic properties of clay, such as discrete element method, Monte Carlo simulation, and molecular dynamics simulation (Bayesteh & Mirghasemi, 2015; Ebrahimi et al, 2014; Hu et al, 2018; Meyer et al, 2001; Sun et al, 2015). Most of these simulations assume that the clay surfaces are uniformly covered with several layers of water molecules, which is usually too ideal to be representative of the actual water distribution in the subsurface.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%