2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcis.2022.01.016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Molecular origins of Epoxy-Amine/Iron oxide interphase formation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
24
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 62 publications
3
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For thermoplastic polymer nanocomposites, the polymer/nanoparticle interaction strength is believed to play a critical role in controlling the thermomechanical properties of the interfacial polymer layer . For example, the interfacial layer in polymer nanocomposites with a strong nanoparticle/polymer interaction generally exhibits an increase in the T g and stiffness compared with that for unfilled polymers and vice versa. However, such a well-established relationship might not be applicable to predict the modification of the thermomechanical properties of the interfacial layer in epoxy nanocomposites. , Many studies have demonstrated that the presence of solid particles alters not only the dynamics of epoxy resin precursors but also their stoichiometric ratio from the corresponding unfilled systems, especially in regions near the particle surface. Indeed, recent simulation and experimental studies by Tanaka and co-workers have proven a dependence of the stoichiometric ratio between epoxy and amine molecules on the distance to a solid interface, at which an excess amount of amine molecules was observed. , Such changes in both the dynamics and ratio of the epoxy precursors can significantly influence the curing kinetics of the network formation around the particles, giving rise to a complex structural and mechanical behavior for the interfacial epoxy layer. Unfortunately, a direct quantification of the local properties at the nanoparticle/epoxy interface remains challenging, and, thus, information about the true mechanical response at this nanoscale interface is still limited …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For thermoplastic polymer nanocomposites, the polymer/nanoparticle interaction strength is believed to play a critical role in controlling the thermomechanical properties of the interfacial polymer layer . For example, the interfacial layer in polymer nanocomposites with a strong nanoparticle/polymer interaction generally exhibits an increase in the T g and stiffness compared with that for unfilled polymers and vice versa. However, such a well-established relationship might not be applicable to predict the modification of the thermomechanical properties of the interfacial layer in epoxy nanocomposites. , Many studies have demonstrated that the presence of solid particles alters not only the dynamics of epoxy resin precursors but also their stoichiometric ratio from the corresponding unfilled systems, especially in regions near the particle surface. Indeed, recent simulation and experimental studies by Tanaka and co-workers have proven a dependence of the stoichiometric ratio between epoxy and amine molecules on the distance to a solid interface, at which an excess amount of amine molecules was observed. , Such changes in both the dynamics and ratio of the epoxy precursors can significantly influence the curing kinetics of the network formation around the particles, giving rise to a complex structural and mechanical behavior for the interfacial epoxy layer. Unfortunately, a direct quantification of the local properties at the nanoparticle/epoxy interface remains challenging, and, thus, information about the true mechanical response at this nanoscale interface is still limited …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The cross‐linking reaction was characterized by the consumption of the characteristic epoxy band at 907 cm −1 , attributed to the asymmetric ether stretch of glycidyl groups, Figure 2 30,31 . This was found to occur at the same time as the growth of a band at 1108 cm −1 , assigned to the asymmetric stretch of the secondary hydroxyl groups produced during the epoxy‐phenolic reaction 13,14,32 …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…30,31 This was found to occur at the same time as the growth of a band at 1108 cm À1 , assigned to the asymmetric stretch of the secondary hydroxyl groups produced during the epoxyphenolic reaction. 13,14,32 Integration of the characteristic epoxy band at 907 cm À1 , and normalization to the aromatic band at 1504 cm À1 , allowed epoxy consumption to be compared in each case, Figure 3a. For the higher temperature cure reactions, epoxy levels are rapidly depleted (within 10 and 1 min at 150 and 200 C, respectively) and then level off, indicating a complete reaction.…”
Section: In-situ Fourier Transform Infrared Spectroscopymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It was found that the addition of nanosized BaTiO 3 particles into a ferroelectric polymer enlarged the size of local conformational disorder in the matrix, suggesting that the all-trans conformation was locally stabilized in the polymer nanocomposite. Morsch et al 171,172 used NanoIR to illustrate the curing process of the interface between epoxy-amine and iron oxide. Hauffman et al probed the chemical interactions at the poly(acrylic acid) (PAA)/Al 2 O 3 interface.…”
Section: Detection Of Localmentioning
confidence: 99%