2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.funbio.2016.01.014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Molecular taxonomy of scopulariopsis-like fungi with description of new clinical and environmental species

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
17
0
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
2
17
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Previous studies have reviewed the molecular phylogenetic relationships among members of this family (Lackner and Hoog, 2011, Lackner et al., 2014, Sandoval-Denis et al., 2016), providing a broad phylogenetic backbone through a molecular overview of this group of fungi. It was demonstrated that this family shows an intricate phylogenetic structure composed of several genera that share similar ecological and morphological features (Lackner and Hoog, 2011, Lackner et al., 2014, Jagielski et al., 2016, Sandoval-Denis et al., 2016). Due to the lack of DNA sequences in public databases and the paucity of phylogenetic studies, several genera of the family, particularly those with synnematous conidiophores or conidia with germ slits were still of uncertain affinities.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Previous studies have reviewed the molecular phylogenetic relationships among members of this family (Lackner and Hoog, 2011, Lackner et al., 2014, Sandoval-Denis et al., 2016), providing a broad phylogenetic backbone through a molecular overview of this group of fungi. It was demonstrated that this family shows an intricate phylogenetic structure composed of several genera that share similar ecological and morphological features (Lackner and Hoog, 2011, Lackner et al., 2014, Jagielski et al., 2016, Sandoval-Denis et al., 2016). Due to the lack of DNA sequences in public databases and the paucity of phylogenetic studies, several genera of the family, particularly those with synnematous conidiophores or conidia with germ slits were still of uncertain affinities.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, our current and recent phylogenetic results (Sandoval-Denis et al., 2016, Jagielski et al., 2016) showed the above-mentioned genera to comprise distinct lineages. Their genetic diversity correlates with subtle morphological differences, such as the presence or absence of hyaline or pigmented annellidic conidiogenous cells, unicellular or septate annelloconidia and/or solitary conidia with or without germ slits (Table 2).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The tub2 sequences were omitted in the genus phylogeny because of alignment difficulties. Based on former phylogenetic studies (Jagielski et al., 2016, Sandoval-Denis et al., 2016) Pithoascus stoveri (CBS 176.71) was used as out-group in the Microascus phylogeny, Pseudoscopulariopsis schumacheri (CBS 435.86) in the Scopulariopsis phylogeny, and Cephalotrichum stemonitis (CBS 103.19) in the genus phylogeny.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Subsequently, these habitats are plotted behind the species name, to which the isolate belongs, in the genus phylogeny tree. The habitats from isolates studied by others (Ropars et al., 2012, Jagielski et al., 2016, Sandoval-Denis et al., 2016) are also included. Finally, a table showing which Microascus , Scopulariopsis and Yunnania species are present in which habitat is constructed.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation