2022
DOI: 10.31124/advance.20486262.v1
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Monadic Emotions, Dyadic Emotions, Triadic Emotions: The 1-2-3 Emotion Model (Peircean Kainopythagorean Phaneroscopic Model of Emotion) and the Fundamental Questions to the Emotion-Involved Processing Hypothesis

Abstract: <p>In this paper, the author theoretically elaborated on the Emotion-Involved Processing Hypothesis (Kanazawa, 2021 in <em>Sage Open</em>) via three fundamental questions. Utilizing the undereappreciated phaneroscopic categories of Charles Sanders Peirce and via a plethora of previous findings in psychology, philosophy, and neuroscience, the author proposed a novel and promising conceptual framework of Monadic, Dyadic, and Triadic Emotions that has multiple advantages and significant potentia… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The finding has a theoretical implication related to the renowned LoP framework (Craik & Lockhart, 1972), which has had a strong influence on second language acquisition (SLA) theories and practices. 8 As was reviewed in Kanazawa (2020b), the LoP framework postulates that semantic processing is deeper processing which is gifted with the best retentional advantage compared with shallow perceptual processing. The present finding suggests that the Emotion-Involved Processing may well be regarded as a sui generis deeper level of processing that is qualitatively distinguishable from mere semantic processing, supporting the Emotion-Involved Processing Hypothesis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…The finding has a theoretical implication related to the renowned LoP framework (Craik & Lockhart, 1972), which has had a strong influence on second language acquisition (SLA) theories and practices. 8 As was reviewed in Kanazawa (2020b), the LoP framework postulates that semantic processing is deeper processing which is gifted with the best retentional advantage compared with shallow perceptual processing. The present finding suggests that the Emotion-Involved Processing may well be regarded as a sui generis deeper level of processing that is qualitatively distinguishable from mere semantic processing, supporting the Emotion-Involved Processing Hypothesis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although investigating the relatively static lexical valence that is accessed and activated passively and the processing depth in more detail by utilizing varied experimental paradigms and neurophysiological measures would be interesting and desirable as a theoretical and psycholinguistic study (i.e., language science), the effort and research resource needed to proceed to such psycholinguistic investigation could also be used otherwise for higher pragmaticistic value, namely, to aim to meet the emotional design of research (cf. Kanazawa, 2020b) and to be more pedagogically implicative and educationally practical (i.e., language education). What is needed for a better theoretical contribution to EmAL is an understanding of how micro-level emotion can contribute to the acquisition of new language in an active-dynamic manner.…”
Section: Processing Mode: Pragmaticistic Turn Toward Active-dynamic E...mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations