2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.compeleceng.2017.02.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Monitoring system reaction in cyber-physical testbed under cyber-attacks

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
16
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
16
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, several recent ICS testbeds for investigating cyber security are developed in the literature and Table 1 presents comparisons among these testbeds for diverse range of applications that are based on TYPE (simulation (S), physical (P), real ICS (R), and hybrid (H)), Process, Data Type (network data (NET) and process data (PR)), Detection Method, Attacks, Attack Type (emulation (E) and physical (P)). As shown in this table, in [17]- [25] cyber-physical testbeds are developed for the physical water system and different case studies in terms of data type, communication and attack injection/detection are presented. In [17], a modelbased detection approach is developed to detect three different attacks by using network data.…”
Section: A Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Furthermore, several recent ICS testbeds for investigating cyber security are developed in the literature and Table 1 presents comparisons among these testbeds for diverse range of applications that are based on TYPE (simulation (S), physical (P), real ICS (R), and hybrid (H)), Process, Data Type (network data (NET) and process data (PR)), Detection Method, Attacks, Attack Type (emulation (E) and physical (P)). As shown in this table, in [17]- [25] cyber-physical testbeds are developed for the physical water system and different case studies in terms of data type, communication and attack injection/detection are presented. In [17], a modelbased detection approach is developed to detect three different attacks by using network data.…”
Section: A Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As shown in this table, in [17]- [25] cyber-physical testbeds are developed for the physical water system and different case studies in terms of data type, communication and attack injection/detection are presented. In [17], a modelbased detection approach is developed to detect three different attacks by using network data. Also, a physics-based detection approach is presented in [18] in order to detect stealthy vulnerability by using the process data.…”
Section: A Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In gas transmission [161,162], SCADA system controls and monitors moisture, quantity, pressure, and temperature of the network of pipelines. In water distribution systems, cyber-attacks can be considered to control unexpected scenarios that can potentially produce shortages and can reduce the water quality for public consumption [163,164]. In the case of smart-grids, cyber-attacks can cause damage at connecting physical assets [165,166].…”
Section: Agent-based Complex Networkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In gas transmission [152,153], SCADA system controls and monitors moisture, quantity, pressure and temperature of the network of pipelines. In water distribution systems, cyber-attacks can be considered to control unexpected scenarios that can potentially produce shortages and reduce the water quality for public consumption [154,155]. In the case of smart-grids, cyber-attacks can cause damage at connecting physical assets [156,157].…”
Section: Agent-based Complex Networkmentioning
confidence: 99%