2020
DOI: 10.1016/bs.aecr.2020.01.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Monitoring tropical forest degradation and restoration with satellite remote sensing: A test using Sabah Biodiversity Experiment

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 90 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The copyright holder for this preprint this version posted September 13, 2022. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.09.09.507141 doi: bioRxiv preprint 5 cover, aboveground biomass and Leaf Area Index in 2012 and estimates of cover from Landsat from 1999 (prior to enrichment planting) to 2012 (24).…”
Section: Main Textmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The copyright holder for this preprint this version posted September 13, 2022. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.09.09.507141 doi: bioRxiv preprint 5 cover, aboveground biomass and Leaf Area Index in 2012 and estimates of cover from Landsat from 1999 (prior to enrichment planting) to 2012 (24).…”
Section: Main Textmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The treatments include: unplanted controls, single-species plots enrichment planted with seedlings of one of sixteen different species of dipterocarp; polycultures planted with mixtures of 4 or 16 species; sixteen species mixtures with additional liana removal; and manipulations (within the 4-species treatment) of generic diversity and predicted canopy complexity (Table 1). To gain an overview of the effects of the experimental treatments on the whole 500 ha area of the experiment over time we used multiple sources of satellite remote sensing data including RapidEye estimates of vegetation 5 cover, aboveground biomass and Leaf Area Index in 2012 and estimates of cover from Landsat from 1999 (prior to enrichment planting) to 2012 (24).…”
Section: Main Textmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For this purpose, remote sensing techniques were employed, in order to allow the spatial analysis of extensive areas, to have fast and continuous imaging of the surface, and, mainly, to make products available free of charges. Of equal importance, it is emphasized that remote sensing has often been used as a tool for monitoring and modeling aspects of vegetation [ 20 22 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With the development of remote sensing technology, a series of remote sensing vegetation parameters, such as the Fraction of Absorbed Photosynthetically Active Radiation (FAPAR), the Leaf Area Index (LAI), and the Fractional Vegetation Cover (FVC), which can reflect the characteristics of the vegetation canopy structure, have been proposed [26][27][28]. Compared with the NDVI and EVI, these parameters can further reflect the habitat information for species [29,30], and long-time series quantitative remote sensing datasets based on these remote sensing vegetation parameters can provide an important opportunity to analyze the spatial distribution pattern of animal species richness caused by vegetation phenology changes on a large scale [31,32]. Nonetheless, the explicit analysis of the relationship between the animal species richness and the different vegetation phenology parameters extracted with remote sensing data is almost absent from the literature.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%