2003
DOI: 10.1142/s0217751x03016422
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Monopoles Near the Planck Scale and Unification

Abstract: Considering our (3 + 1)-dimensional space-time as, in some way, discrete or lattice with a parameter a = λ P , where λ P is the Planck length, we have investigated the additional contributions of lattice artifact monopoles to beta-functions of the renormalisation group equations for the running fine structure constants α i (µ) (i=1,2,3 correspond to the U(1), SU(2) and SU (3) gauge groups of the Standard Model) in the Family Replicated Gauge Group Model (FRGGM) which is an extension of the Standard Model at hi… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This is at odds with the modern understanding of renormalization as a continuous evolution of parameters, such as the charge, with change of energy scale. It would seem that this view of the renormalization group may be difficult to maintain without a perturbative framework: That is, at any energy scale Q, we might expect e(Q)g(Q) = n. (6.4) For this reason Laperashvili and Nielsen [125,126,127,128,129], following Zwanziger [80,82] argue that (6.4) holds at all scales, or in terms of the bare and renormalized quantization numbers, n = n 0 . That is, the electric and magnetic charges are renormalized by exactly inverse factors.…”
Section: Renormalizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This is at odds with the modern understanding of renormalization as a continuous evolution of parameters, such as the charge, with change of energy scale. It would seem that this view of the renormalization group may be difficult to maintain without a perturbative framework: That is, at any energy scale Q, we might expect e(Q)g(Q) = n. (6.4) For this reason Laperashvili and Nielsen [125,126,127,128,129], following Zwanziger [80,82] argue that (6.4) holds at all scales, or in terms of the bare and renormalized quantization numbers, n = n 0 . That is, the electric and magnetic charges are renormalized by exactly inverse factors.…”
Section: Renormalizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For this reason Laperashvili and co-workers [126][127][128][129][130], following Zwanziger [80,82], argue that (6.4) holds at all scales or in terms of the bare and renormalized quantization numbers, n = n 0 . That is, the electric and magnetic charges are renormalized by exactly inverse factors.…”
Section: Renormalizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The aim of the present talk is to show that monopoles cannot be seen in the Standard Model and in its usual extensions, known in the literature, up to the Planck scale [1,2]:…”
Section: The Problem Of Monopoles In the Standard Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[This is (3.21) with A = A ′ given by the second form in (3.24) withn =ẑ.] Even though this is much more complicated than the Coulomb Hamiltonian, the wavefunction still may be separated: 127) where the radial and angular factors satisfy…”
Section: Nonrelativistic Hamiltonianmentioning
confidence: 99%