2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.jim.2007.06.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Monospecific and bispecific antibodies against E. coli O157 for diagnostics

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Use of the ethanol precipitation of polysaccharides and of the phenol-chloroform extraction procedures described above was required for detection of as few as 7 CFU/liter of E. coli O157:H7 bacteria in highly turbid river water. This detection limit for E. coli O157:H7 bacteria in river water samples represents an improvement of several orders of magnitude over those of previous methods for water analysis (7,8,12). Direct PCR analysis of DNA was able to detect 2 ϫ 10 5 CFU/liter of E. coli O157:H7 bacteria in ground water (8).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 82%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Use of the ethanol precipitation of polysaccharides and of the phenol-chloroform extraction procedures described above was required for detection of as few as 7 CFU/liter of E. coli O157:H7 bacteria in highly turbid river water. This detection limit for E. coli O157:H7 bacteria in river water samples represents an improvement of several orders of magnitude over those of previous methods for water analysis (7,8,12). Direct PCR analysis of DNA was able to detect 2 ϫ 10 5 CFU/liter of E. coli O157:H7 bacteria in ground water (8).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…The combination of this one-step capture-extraction method with the RT-PCR electronic DNA microarray detection technique was demonstrated to be capable of detecting 3 to 4 CFU of E. coli O157:H7 in 1 liter of tap water without cultural enrichment. Compared to the detection limits of 1,000 CFU/liter in drinking water (with DNA as a target) after 21 h of culture enrichment (7) and of 10 5 CFU/ liter (based on antibody determinations) in tap water (12), our method represents a substantial improvement for specific detection of viable E. coli O157:H7 bacteria. This method needs only minimum sample preparation and does not require culture enrichment.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Staphylococcus aureus (Guttikonda et al, 2007;Jung et al, 2003;McCarthy and Culloty, 2011;McClelland and Pinder, 1994 researchers use pure unconjugated primary antibodies to label target molecules. Thereafter, a range of commercially available secondary antibodies conjugated to a range of markers are used to reveal the labelled complex (primary antibody-antigen).…”
Section: O N O C Y T O G E N E S E S C H E R I C H I a C O L I O 1 mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is important to note that low colony forming units (CFU) of E. coli O157:H7 present in contaminated food and water is generally sufficient to cause a severe infection, therefore having a sensitive method for detection during investigations of outbreaks is vital. A highly sensitive BsMAb-based immunodetection assay was developed by our laboratory for the detection of E. coli O157:H7 in water samples (Guttikonda et al 2007). E. coli O157:H7 whole bacteria and E. coli O157:H7 lipopolysaccharide (LPS) were used to first generate a monoclonal antibody, the hybridoma of which, was fused with anti-HRPO secreting monoclonal antibody hybridoma (Kreutz et al 1998;Suresh et al 1986b) to generate a quadroma producing BsMAb specific for both E. coli O157 and HRPO.…”
Section: Escherichia Coli O157:h7mentioning
confidence: 99%