1992
DOI: 10.1007/bf02060936
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Monte Carlo (importance) sampling within a benders decomposition algorithm for stochastic linear programs

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
119
0

Year Published

1999
1999
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 179 publications
(120 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
1
119
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Objective function values are computed for the candidate solutions using the own samples of each algorithm and compared to the optimal objective function value that is computed for the exact optimal solution based on a large sample of 150,000 realizations. As we can see from Figure 7, the standard deviations of the objective functions are smaller for APS samples, which is in line with the importance sampling results of Parpas et al (2013) andInfanger (1993). Furthermore, based on the MAPE, the optimality gap for APS approach is also consistently found to be smaller compared with the SAA approach.…”
Section: Performance Resultssupporting
confidence: 79%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Objective function values are computed for the candidate solutions using the own samples of each algorithm and compared to the optimal objective function value that is computed for the exact optimal solution based on a large sample of 150,000 realizations. As we can see from Figure 7, the standard deviations of the objective functions are smaller for APS samples, which is in line with the importance sampling results of Parpas et al (2013) andInfanger (1993). Furthermore, based on the MAPE, the optimality gap for APS approach is also consistently found to be smaller compared with the SAA approach.…”
Section: Performance Resultssupporting
confidence: 79%
“…The proposal distribution is designed to place more weight in the region of high Q x values, thus providing a more efficient estimate of E Q x . Proposals for g are described as additive (Infanger 1993) or multiplicative (Dantzig and Thapa 1997) functions.…”
Section: Simulation-based Stochastic Programmingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For illustration purposes we describe in detail the results of applying the methodology to the test problem APLlP, which is a small electric power expansion planning problem with uncertainty in three demands and in the availability of two generators; see hfanger (1992) [31]. The master problem has 3 rows and 3 columns and each second-stage scenario has 6 rows and 9 columns.…”
Section: Testmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The approach by Dantzig and Glynn (1990) [lo] and Infanger (1992) [31] combines Benders decomposition and Monte Carlo importance sampling for solving stochastic linear programs. Importance sampling serves as a variance-reduction technique and in practice often results in accurate estimates being obtained' with only small sample sizes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For stochastic linear programs, i.e. when the secondstage problem is linear, the convexity of the second-stage value function along with this decomposability property has been exploited to develop a number of decomposition-based algorithms [4,11,13,19,25] as well as gradient-based algorithms [8,23].…”
Section: Computational Challengesmentioning
confidence: 99%