2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejmp.2022.08.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Monte Carlo modelling of pixel clusters in Timepix detectors using the MCNP code

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0
1

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
4
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The resolution power for particle-event-type discrimination varies according to each specific sensor. The next steps include high-energy per-pixel calibration [13], Monte Carlo simulations [14], development of a model, and a technique to quantify the comparison and investigation of the detector response between sensors. Additional tests can be performed with laboratory radioisotopes with well-defined alpha particles and discrete X-rays and gamma rays.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The resolution power for particle-event-type discrimination varies according to each specific sensor. The next steps include high-energy per-pixel calibration [13], Monte Carlo simulations [14], development of a model, and a technique to quantify the comparison and investigation of the detector response between sensors. Additional tests can be performed with laboratory radioisotopes with well-defined alpha particles and discrete X-rays and gamma rays.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…the geometric details of the gantry nozzle and the aluminum case of the detector were neglected. Also, the pixelated structure and charge-sharing effect (Campbell et al 2007, Bouchami et al 2011c, Teyssier et al 2012, Šolc et al 2022 occurring in the Timepix sensor were not included in the MC simulations. However, it is unlikely that these details have a substantial impact on the MC simulationʼs accuracy.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Calculating and minimization of the momentum of inertia is the core of the final estimation. The elevation angle is in the favorable cases estimated based on the geometrical idea of particle full cross complemented with correction for charge sharing (length in the sensor plane deriving from polar angle is corrected for charge sharing effect which smears the true track length of the particle) [14]. This analysis has its limitations, for example in the cases when a particle is fully stopped in the sensor or the incident/elevation angle of a particle is close to the perpendicular direction to the sensor.…”
Section: Directional and Compton Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%