2012
DOI: 10.5488/cmp.15.23803
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Monte Carlo simulation of the electrical properties of electrolytes adsorbed in charged slit-systems

Abstract: We study the adsorption of primitive model electrolytes into a layered slit system using grand canonical Monte Carlo simulations. The slit system contains a series of charged membranes. The ions are forbidden from the membranes, while they are allowed to be adsorbed into the slits between the membranes. We focus on the electrical properties of the slit system. We show concentration, charge, electric field, and electrical potential profiles. We show that the potential difference between the slit system and the … Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
13
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 58 publications
2
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Since −E * (x) is the integral of the charge profile, it means that there is more cationic charge in the outer DLs and less in the outer slits compared to the σ M = −0.1 C m −2 case, namely, we "overcharge" the DLs. This case results in a potential profile also observed in our previous work [2]; the potential drop is smaller (in absolute value) in the outer DLs than in the central membranes. If we denote the potential drop in the DL by Φ DL and the potential drop in the central membranes by Φ M [called membrane potential, see figure 2…”
Section: -4supporting
confidence: 80%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Since −E * (x) is the integral of the charge profile, it means that there is more cationic charge in the outer DLs and less in the outer slits compared to the σ M = −0.1 C m −2 case, namely, we "overcharge" the DLs. This case results in a potential profile also observed in our previous work [2]; the potential drop is smaller (in absolute value) in the outer DLs than in the central membranes. If we denote the potential drop in the DL by Φ DL and the potential drop in the central membranes by Φ M [called membrane potential, see figure 2…”
Section: -4supporting
confidence: 80%
“…This way, we assure that the simulation cell is charge neutral in every instant of the simulation. The acceptance probability of these steps is found in our previous paper [2]. The chemical potentials needed for the GCMC simulations' input were determined by the Adaptive-GCMC method of Malasics et al [73,74].…”
Section: -2mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…where q(z) is defined in equation (3). This relation yields the potential in slit systems with Neumann boundary conditions up to an arbitrary constant [66]. We choose this constant such that the midplane potential φ(L/2) is identical to that obtained from FMT-PB-MSA.…”
Section: Iii1 Simulation Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[34][35][36][37][38] A planar EDL in water (at 298 K) has been simulated here. In this work, simulations were performed within the primitive model, in which ions are considered charged hard spheres and the solvent is thought of as a continuum of dielectric constant ε r .…”
Section: Model and Simulationmentioning
confidence: 99%