1985
DOI: 10.1007/bf00018590
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

More on compliance of the three-point bend specimen

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1988
1988
2009
2009

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, high irradiation cost together with the restricted volume of irradiation facilities such as International Fusion Materials Irradiation Facility (IFMIF) [3] will require application of a single specimen technology using partial specimen uploading procedure. Estimation of crack grows by using either compliance [4] or calibrated electric potential [5] method, however, is supposed to introduce additional uncertainties in the fracture toughness value of irradiated specimens. Above mentioned reasons make application of reliable failure assessment criteria concerned with the initiation of fracture very attractive.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, high irradiation cost together with the restricted volume of irradiation facilities such as International Fusion Materials Irradiation Facility (IFMIF) [3] will require application of a single specimen technology using partial specimen uploading procedure. Estimation of crack grows by using either compliance [4] or calibrated electric potential [5] method, however, is supposed to introduce additional uncertainties in the fracture toughness value of irradiated specimens. Above mentioned reasons make application of reliable failure assessment criteria concerned with the initiation of fracture very attractive.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…by means of the elastic compliance c of the specimen, given for example by Underwood et al (1985). Using (7) and (8), a KCM can be obtained, starting from F(s pl , a) instead of (5)…”
Section: Key Curve Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%