2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.clindermatol.2013.05.028
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Morphologic grading and treatment of facial actinic keratosis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
72
0
14

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 75 publications
(88 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
2
72
0
14
Order By: Relevance
“…The diagnosis of AK was performed both clinically and dermoscopically, respectively based on the presence of erythematous macular lesions with or without a slightly scaly surface, and on the identification of the typical red pseudonetwork, corresponding to grade I AK, or strawberry pattern, corresponding to grade II AK[12]. …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The diagnosis of AK was performed both clinically and dermoscopically, respectively based on the presence of erythematous macular lesions with or without a slightly scaly surface, and on the identification of the typical red pseudonetwork, corresponding to grade I AK, or strawberry pattern, corresponding to grade II AK[12]. …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A review of each patient’s medical record, including age, sex, clinical stage,9 pathologic report, and mode of IM treatment, number of AKs before and after treatment, LSRs, and the degree of pain was performed. Photographs were taken before the initial treatment and on every visit during follow-up periods.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Occurrence of distant metastases is rare and does not exceed the 5% of cases of primary lesions which undergo excision [7]. SCC occurs frequently in the so-called cancerization field mainly characterized by dysplasia of keratinocytes [11]. Obviously, rising up from a plain dysplastic field, these cancers can often present positive margins, which may cause an incorrect assessment of the clinical macroscopic margins or an incorrect interpretation of dysplasia itself.…”
Section: Discussion and Review Of The Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%