1986
DOI: 10.1002/cne.902540203
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Morphological alterations in subcortical vibrissal relays following vibrissal follicle destruction at birth in the mouse

Abstract: Morphological modifications of two subcortical vibrissal relays were analyzed, following destruction of vibrissal follicles in newborn mice. The volume of the nucleus interpolaris (NI) of the trigeminal nuclear complex in the brainstem decreased by 33%, while the number of its neuronal perikarya decreased only moderately. Vibrissal deafferentation caused no shrinkage of the ventrobasal complex (VB). In the damaged medial vibrissal part of VB (VBm), however, neuronal density was higher than normal, indicating t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
6
1

Year Published

1987
1987
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
2
6
1
Order By: Relevance
“…After section of the infraorbital (IO) nerve in vehicletreated animals, the pattern of barrelettes associated with the mystacial whiskers was disrupted in all nuclei, which is consistent with previous studies using either nerve lesions (Waite and de Permentier, 1991;Chiaia et al, 1992b) or vibrissal damage (Belford and Killackey, 1979a;Durham and Woolsey, 1984;Há mori et al, 1986). However, 2 patches were still apparent in the maxillary/ophthalmic region of the nucleus.…”
Section: Capsaicin and Enlarged Patch Development: Lesioned Sidesupporting
confidence: 88%
“…After section of the infraorbital (IO) nerve in vehicletreated animals, the pattern of barrelettes associated with the mystacial whiskers was disrupted in all nuclei, which is consistent with previous studies using either nerve lesions (Waite and de Permentier, 1991;Chiaia et al, 1992b) or vibrissal damage (Belford and Killackey, 1979a;Durham and Woolsey, 1984;Há mori et al, 1986). However, 2 patches were still apparent in the maxillary/ophthalmic region of the nucleus.…”
Section: Capsaicin and Enlarged Patch Development: Lesioned Sidesupporting
confidence: 88%
“…Although blackened, disintegrating terminals were very rarely observed in the present study of laminae I and II, they have been observed after infraorbital injury at birth in the alaminar subnucleus interpolaris (Hamori et al, 1986) and in the deeper laminae of the subnucleus caudalis (Arvidsson and Swallinger, 1990) at postnatal ages similar to those studied here. Although there is good evidence that substantive primary afferent inputs to laminae I and II are maintained after neonatal infraorbital nerve transection Rhoades, 1983, 1985;Enfiejian et al, 1989;Bennett-Clarke and Chiaia, 1992), it is highly unlikely that this region is spared completely from transganglionic degeneration.…”
Section: Transganglionic Degeneration After Neonatal Nerve Injurysupporting
confidence: 52%
“…On the other hand, laminae I and II of V subnucleus caudalis (i.e., medullary dorsal horn) appear to be largely impervious to this manipulation. Although degenerating terminals have been observed in subnucleus interpolaris (Hamori et al, 1986) and laminae III and IV of subnucleus caudalis (Arvidsson and Swallinger, 1990), degenerating terminals are only rarely seen in laminae I and II (Grant and Arvidsson, 1975;Arvidsson and Swallinger, 1990).…”
mentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Thus, such competitive interactions are unlikely to contribute to the early formation of a peripherally dependent pattern. A third possibility is suggested by the report of Hamori et al (1986) that the number of thalamic projection neurons in the vibrissae-related region of the ventroposterior nucleus is increased after neonatal damage to the vibrissae follicles. The possibility that a uniform increase in the number of thalamocortical projection neurons causes the lower density and in- Figure 10; g, Figure 5, h and i, Fields corresponding to adjacent arbors in Figure 6.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%