2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.jasrep.2019.101979
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Movement across a ‘mountain barrier’: Mapping accessibility with rock-art and GIS in the Altai Mountains, Eastern Eurasia

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Rock art sites with a wide viewshed may carry additional significance (Jacobson-Tepfer, 2019, pp. 98-99), as the location of rock art in mountain passes is often associated with commonly traversed routes (O'Sullivan, 2019). Because of its highly visible location, we suggest that the panels at Unegt Uul reflect a high-traffic area, and the panels at this location might have carried important semantic meaning (i.e.…”
Section: Environment and Biogeographymentioning
confidence: 84%
“…Rock art sites with a wide viewshed may carry additional significance (Jacobson-Tepfer, 2019, pp. 98-99), as the location of rock art in mountain passes is often associated with commonly traversed routes (O'Sullivan, 2019). Because of its highly visible location, we suggest that the panels at Unegt Uul reflect a high-traffic area, and the panels at this location might have carried important semantic meaning (i.e.…”
Section: Environment and Biogeographymentioning
confidence: 84%
“…Scripts enable robust and rapid visualisation of the data, especially in case of mapping large datasets, which presents a significant advantage compared to conventional mapping routine. This is different from the existing numerous applications of GIS [79][80][81][82][83][84][85]. For instance, compared to the scripting mapping, traditional mapping is largely based on the GUI-based approach [86][87][88][89].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…g. SRTM(NASA JPL, 2013) ,ASTER (NASA JPL, 2009) and EU-DEM (GMES RDA Project, 2013), Ordnance Survey Terrain 50 (Ordnance Survey, 2020)) that are commonly used within archaeological LCP studies (e.g Bebber et al, 2017;Browne and Wilson, 2013;Carter et al, 2019;Diwan and Doumit, 2017;Lock and Pouncett, 2010;Moutsiou and Agapiou, 2019;O'Sullivan, 2019;Rademaker et al, 2012;Rosenswig and Martínez Tuñón, 2020;Taliaferro et al, 2010…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%