2018
DOI: 10.1007/s40815-018-0499-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Methods in Bipolar Fuzzy Environment

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
38
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 120 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
38
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This section provides a comparative analysis of presented bipolar fuzzy ELECTRE II method with already existing MADM methods such as TOPSIS and ELECTRE I models under bipolar fuzzy environment, which were presented by Alghamdi et al [29]. We applied these methods to the numerical problem presented in Section 3.1, as "selection of business location" to compare the different MCDM methods.…”
Section: Discussion and Comparative Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This section provides a comparative analysis of presented bipolar fuzzy ELECTRE II method with already existing MADM methods such as TOPSIS and ELECTRE I models under bipolar fuzzy environment, which were presented by Alghamdi et al [29]. We applied these methods to the numerical problem presented in Section 3.1, as "selection of business location" to compare the different MCDM methods.…”
Section: Discussion and Comparative Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the last two decades, bipolar fuzzy sets have been studied and applied increasingly by many researchers in different directions. Alghamdi et al [29] introduced the MCDM methods TOPSIS and ELECTRE I, in bipolar fuzzy environment. Akram and Arshad [30] presented a novel trapezoidal bipolar fuzzy TOPSIS method for group decision-making.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, in many cases, the given information is bipolar in nature. Recently, a bipolar fuzzy TOPSIS method for the suitable selection of objects was discussed in [5]. However, in this method, the weights are chosen arbitrarily, which can be changed according to the choice of decision-makers.…”
Section: A View Of Bipolar Fuzzy Extended Topsismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To solve various real-world decision-making problems, fuzzy and intuitionistic TOPSIS methods were discussed in [3,4]. Alghamdi [5] proposed TOPSIS methods for multi-criteria decision-making methods in a bipolar fuzzy environment and illustrated them with various examples. To deal with the limitations of classical TOPSIS, the researchers in [6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16] have extended the concept of the TOPSIS method under a fuzzy, intuitionistic fuzzy, interval-valued fuzzy and bipolar fuzzy environment for the multi-criteria selection of objects.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since then, several extended TOPSIS methods have been applied to different MCDM problems including [25][26][27]. Further, Alghamdi et al [28] introduced the multi-criteria decision-making methods in the bipolar fuzzy environment. Chu and Lin [29] used the fuzzy TOPSIS method for the selection of robots.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%