Proceedings of the 27th ACM Conference on User Modeling, Adaptation and Personalization 2019
DOI: 10.1145/3320435.3320441
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multi-faceted Trust-based Collaborative Filtering

Abstract: Many collaborative recommender systems leverage social correlation theories to improve suggestion performance. However, they focus on explicit relations between users and they leave out other types of information that can contribute to determine users' global reputation; e.g., public recognition of reviewers' quality.We are interested in understanding if and when these additional types of feedback improve Top-N recommendation. For this purpose, we propose a multi-faceted trust model to integrate local trust, r… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
34
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
34
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This work extends the preliminary multi-faceted trust model presented in (Mauro et al, 2019) as follows: firstly, we integrate the facets of trust in Ma-trix Factorization, instead of using a K-Nearest Neighbors model. Secondly, we perform more detailed and extensive experiments to evaluate recommendation performance: (i) we analyze the impact of the facets of trust on recommendation by tuning the components of MTM in a finer-grained way;…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…This work extends the preliminary multi-faceted trust model presented in (Mauro et al, 2019) as follows: firstly, we integrate the facets of trust in Ma-trix Factorization, instead of using a K-Nearest Neighbors model. Secondly, we perform more detailed and extensive experiments to evaluate recommendation performance: (i) we analyze the impact of the facets of trust on recommendation by tuning the components of MTM in a finer-grained way;…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…Inspired by work in the social sciences which have outlined the numerous variables which influence the formation of trust relationships [30], MFTM incorporates arbitrarily many indicators of trustworthiness into a single (optionally context-dependent) trustworthiness score. Operationalizing this core idea for trust and social tie prediction has been proposed by multiple researchers (e.g., [9,13,22,26,29]). As is evident in these works, there is little agreement over whether this technique should be called multi-dimensional, multi-faceted or composite trust modeling, and this confusion has likely led to some difficulty in coordinating efforts in this research direction.…”
Section: Multi-faceted Trust Modelingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A rising trend in this field is to validate models by applying their predictions to a recommendation task (e.g., [9,29]): that is, using the trust model to predict novel trust links, ˆ , in a multiagent system (MAS), then feeding those predicted links into a trust-aware item recommendation system. These trust-aware recommender systems incorporate both user-item rating behavior and user-user social/trust connections to better recommend items by leveraging the fact that social/trust connections exert influence on the preferences of agents (e.g., you are more likely to watch/enjoy a film a trusted friend recommends).…”
Section: Trust-aware Recommendation Systemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In step 2, 18 features were extracted from the profiles and histories of the Yelp users. These features combined generic and domain specific perspectives, taking inspiration from the works of (Mauro, Ardissono, and Hu 2019) and (Fang, Guo, and Zhang 2015) (and moving beyond these solutions by taking a data driven approach to MFTM and employing more than a small set of general purpose indicators). One of the principal advantages of MFTM is its capability to process many features.…”
Section: Recommendation Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%