2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.psep.2016.08.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multi-functionality clean biomass cookstove for off-grid areas

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
15
0
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
1
15
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…该发电火炉燃用固体燃料, 最大发电功率为27 W, 热电转换效率为5%. Najjar等人 [7] 改造了传统的炉灶, 增加了温差发电模块, 实现了热电联供, 最大发电功 率为7.8 W. Mal等人 [8] 设计了一种风冷式温差发电 炉, 采用不同温差发电片时对外供电功率为2~4 W, 同时测量了强迫通风和自然通风时的CO浓度和颗粒 物浓度, 发现强迫通风有效降低了CO浓度和颗粒物 浓度. O'Shaughnessy等人 [9] 制作了若干台温差发电 炉, 发电功率为4~6 W, 并发放到马拉维的无电村落 中, 进行了为期80天的实地测试, 结果发现用户平均 每天只需3 WH电能即可满足需求.…”
Section: 炉的研究意义和研究动态 2009年世界卫生组织估计unclassified
“…该发电火炉燃用固体燃料, 最大发电功率为27 W, 热电转换效率为5%. Najjar等人 [7] 改造了传统的炉灶, 增加了温差发电模块, 实现了热电联供, 最大发电功 率为7.8 W. Mal等人 [8] 设计了一种风冷式温差发电 炉, 采用不同温差发电片时对外供电功率为2~4 W, 同时测量了强迫通风和自然通风时的CO浓度和颗粒 物浓度, 发现强迫通风有效降低了CO浓度和颗粒物 浓度. O'Shaughnessy等人 [9] 制作了若干台温差发电 炉, 发电功率为4~6 W, 并发放到马拉维的无电村落 中, 进行了为期80天的实地测试, 结果发现用户平均 每天只需3 WH电能即可满足需求.…”
Section: 炉的研究意义和研究动态 2009年世界卫生组织估计unclassified
“…Several air-cooled SPTEGs have been developed [12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21]; among these SPTEGs, up to 12 TE modules can be incorporated to generate 7.8 W electric power [19,20]. Natural draft convection cooling [12][13][14]19,20] and forced draft air cooling [15][16][17][18]21] can be adopted. Forced draft air cooling has been attracting increasing attention in recent years given the drawbacks of the natural draft convection cooling, that is, a relatively large volume and mass weight [21].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Over two billion people burn biomass for cooking and heating [ 3 ], which means that the stove-powered thermoelectric generator (STEG) has good prospects. Further, a well-designed STEG can power a blower to improve the combustion inside the stove, reducing CO and particle pollution [ 4 ], which are known to be harmful. Figure 1 shows a basic STEG in diagram form.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For FDAC STEG, Mal et al [ 4 ] tested a STEG, improving the exhaust gas quality (CO and particles) by adding a blowing fan. It was found that the CO and particle concentration decreased significantly when using a blowing fan; while the STEG produced electricity between 2 W and 4 W. O’Shaughnessy et al [ 18 ] distributed several STEGs in off-grid regions and ran a field test for 80 days.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%